Philosophical Mechanics of Nature Instantiating Everything Real

Website Updates! — Please pardon our mess. Construction activities are underway.

It has been said that the general area of the five equations below characterize much of physics, but as you will see, there are several issues. One of which is none of them close to nor are in context of the unified Universe and consequently need to be mode shifted. Another issue is a tendency on the part of investigators to not recognize the implications of employing abstractions within these equations. When we mistake abstractions for actual reality we are committing what is herein referred to as Langer Epistemology Errors. Failure to recognize commission of such errors is a slippery slide into the depths of LEEs Empiricism Trap. One of the implications/ramification of having committed such errors is the failure to recognize that the proverbial road to reality is not necessarily a straight path. Nor is it simple to sort out multiple theories which are all simultaneously correct, have the same consequences, and which agree with experiment relative to which theory is the correct theory. Subjective discussions about which theory looks more natural inevitably ensue. Another problem is discerning whether a given concept is a derivative function of an Encapsulated Interprtative Model (EIM) or is it an actual result of nature (e.g. a law of nature). As you look at the equations that follow, ask not whether or not they are true, because we can demonstrate they are. No, the relevant question here is why they are true and in fully compliant, standards based, context of the unified Universe.

Unification demands and requires the integration of everything real.

NOTE: Mathematics here are instantiated by LaTex html code.

NOTE: What follows does so only because we stand on the shoulders of giants.

The five areas represented immediately below reflect much (if not most) of how status quo thinking modeling reality characterizes reality. However, there is a great deal more going on than is immediately apparent if, and only if, you do not mistake abstractions for actual reality. The implication of that latter point is determined by whether or not the reader is committing Langer Epistemology Errors or not. We will take each in turn and begin to ask questions hopefully that you may begin your journey to the precipice of the unified Universe.

$F = ma$ or perhaps more appropriately as $a = {\frac{F}{m}}$
$F \simeq G{\frac{m_1 m_2}{d^2}}$
$F = k{\frac{q_1 q_2}{d^2}}$
$\nabla \times \overrightarrow{\rm B} = M_0 \overrightarrow{\rm J} + M_0 \xi_0 \frac{d \overrightarrow{\rm E}}{dt}$
$\frac{d^2 u}{dt^2} = v^2 = \frac{d^2 u}{dx^2}$

1. Newton’s Laws of Motion

Newton’s Laws of Motion. Fundamentally in physics every action has a reaction. Many take to be cause and effect.

$F = ma$ or perhaps more appropriately as $a = {\frac{F}{m}}$

The strategic question here deals with the context domains of all real constructs as well as the details of associated reference frames.

Concept Sieve EMCS01:

Thought Experiments

TE-0069: Why Are Newton’s Laws True?

User Library Materials

2. Newtonian Gravitation

$F \simeq G{\frac{m_1 m_2}{d^2}}$

Newton’s gravitational force.

Concept Sieve EMCS01:

User Library Materials

3. Electromagnetism

$F = k{\frac{q_1 q_2}{d^2}}$

The equation listed is Gauss’s electric field and is the first of Maxwell’s equations described in the original systems review notes (p 749).

Concept Sieve EMCS01:

User Library Materials

A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell
Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, by Carl Friedrich Gauss
Mathematical Theory of Electrodynamic Phenomena Uniquely Derived from Experiments, Andre-Marie Ampere
The Death of Schrodinger’s Cat (double blind psychological experiment proves the wave function collapse is logical in nature)

4. Maxwell Ampere Law

The equation listed is Gauss’s electric field and is the first of Maxwell’s equations described in the original systems review notes (p 749).

$\nabla \times \overrightarrow{\rm B} = M_0 \overrightarrow{\rm J} + M_0 \xi_0 \frac{d \overrightarrow{\rm E}}{dt}$

Concept Sieve EMCS01:

User Library Materials

5. Wave Equation

The equation listed is Gauss’s electric field and is the first of Maxwell’s equations described in the original systems review notes (p 749).

$\frac{d^2 u}{dt^2} = v^2 = \frac{d^2 u}{dx^2}$

Concept Sieves

EMCS01: original systems review
- Concept 0184: Dual Electromagnetic Field Tensor (aka Hodge Dual)
EMCS02: Physical Properties
EMCS03: Thermodynamics

User Library Materials

A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell
Computing As A Tool For Human Augmentation, IBM Systems Journal 1986
The Concept of Mass, by Lev B Okun
Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, by Carl Friedrich Gauss
Mathematical Theory of Electrodynamic Phenomena Uniquely Derived from Experiments, Andre-Marie Ampere
Michael Faraday’s Diary, by Michael Faraday
Relativity, by Albert Einstein
The Death of Schrodinger’s Cat (double blind psychological experiment proves the wave function collapse is logical in nature)
Spacetime Structure, by Erwin Schrodinger
The Speed of Entanglement

Key Process Insights

Neils Bohr abstractions — Neils Bohr on abstractions

It is useful here to repeat what the Elegant Reasonism process is relative to the model it produced (e.g. The Emergence Model) in the same cogent sentence for clarity so they are not confused from one another. Below are process steps or phases along with some key insights about physics developed at each stage during the original systems review whose notes are online here. Elegant Reasonism is a utility process employing technology in an analytical framework supporting an epistemology which seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science and which produced the first fully compliant, standards based, Encapsulated Interpretive Model (EIM) closing to unification: The Emergence Model holistically represented by two EIMs M5 and M6. (See Press Release entitled: Unification Accomplished). The source of truth for Elegant Reasonism based materials is the unified Universe. Epistemologically all other truths are statistically weighted relative to and respective of that objective. Evidence, constituting proof, has been subjected to Elegant Reasonism through what we call the realm of c’s relative to and respective of the unified Universe which always litmus and the final arbiter.

Exploiting this approach allows us all to distinguish EIM derived principled laws as a opposed to those actually instantiated laws of nature that are the unified Universe. Strategically this skill is intended to keep investigators from falling prey to LEEs Empiricism Trap and erroneously succumb to monolithic or siloed thinking realative to and respective of the proverbial road to reality. Also it is important for investigators to understand integration of philosophy and all its constituent domains of discourse, including science. Those reasons recognition of those implications and ramifications requires an understanding of the limits of science in isolation relative to the answers they seek. Richard Feynman points out in a 1950s lecture (linked here) that science can not distinguish between multiple logically correct theories, whose consequences are all the same, and which agree with experiment. What we now have, that we did not have during Feynman’s time is Elegant Reasonism. Elegant Reasonism finds scientific empiricism necessary but insufficient, (for all the reasons Feynman points out and a great deal more), in many cases if only because that process over the last several hundred years failed to produce or accomplish unification. In fact science in isolation has obfuscated the path to the precipice from which we may both perceive and engage the unified Universe and we must lose that conceit. We must hold unification as a philosophical predicate priority concept entering science, not after we get into that domain of discourse, because by then we are already inspecting tree bark and have missed the forest..

P1.0 Recognition Phase

One of the hardest paradigms to get over, for me, was understanding the taxonomy of philosophy in unification’s wake. I tend to think of the different philosophical areas akin to software routine areas that may call upon one another to help process the integrated whole, but in the end they must all meet 100% of the criteria laid out in what we call the realm of the c’s and that especially includes there the term ‘close’. The Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart (PDCF) is a recursive loop exactly because many of the issues are subtle and wind up being overlooked on the initial passes. Rigorously lock down every aspect of any investigation no matter how small the issue may seem at first.

See Elegant Reasonism (the process employing a technological framework supporting an epistemology seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe) for list of insights
- Concept Sieves
- Criteria (e.g Realm of c’s)
- Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs) (8 are enumerated models M0, … M7)
- Philosophy: study of the unified Universe (e.g. all that is real) as a source of truth mode shifts:
  1. Axiology: Philosophy of value derivation
  2. Epistemology: Philosophy of knowledge
    1. Constructivism – Piaget argued that knowledge is constructed as the learner strives to organize his or her experiences in terms of preexisting mental structures or schemes
    2. Elegant Reasonism – McGowen argues:
      - Sources truth as a function of the unified Universe
      - Is a superset epistemology in that it may integrate all other epistemologies, so long as their relative context domains are taken into account and they are statistically weighted relative to and respective of the unified Universe.
    3. Empiricism – Sources truth as a function of experience, the ability to duplicate and replicate.
    4. Rationalism – Sources truth as a function of rationalized logic.
    5. … etc.
  3. Logic: Philosophy of valid inference or logical truth
    1. Logic Artifact – study of EIM products of contextual incongruity
    2. Concept Compression (not enough time allowed for concept to exist, … but it does. Example: BX442)
  4. Ontology: Philosophy of being
  5. Science: Philosophy of nature
    1. Biology
    2. Chemistry
    3. Mathematics
    4. Physics (this page)
  6. Supervenience: Philosophy of relation between sets of properties or sets of facts
- Process & Methods
  - Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart (PDCF)
- Rules
- Standards
- Tools
- Translation Matrices <— Enables processes and methods for fundamental mode shifting under Elegant Reasonism Rules (analytical layers are, but not limited to:)
  1. 2D Articulation <— Articulates POI/N manifestation by a plurality of EIMs, and minimally one of which must close to unification
  2. Context & Source <— Historical Context & Source assurance, integrity, abstraction inventory analysis
  3. Model Integrity Analysis <— Encapsulated Interpretive Model (EIM) Analysis for each EIM within the plurality of a given investigation (integrity purposes)
  4. M2M re: POI/N Analysis <— Evidence Chain Pattern Analysis EIM to POI/N and juxtaposition of patterns relative to and respective each EIM
  5. Paradigm Statistics <— POI/N assurance & integrity analysis (e.g. systems review on abstractions representing POI/Ns)
  6. Logic Calculus <— Dove Tail Logic Analysis & Integrity Assurance to interpretive standards within goal & objective requirements (See PDCF Checkpoint Flowchart)
  7. Reality Validation <— Congruence: is reality actually reflected (e.g. BX442, z-factors, Does It Close? questions, anomalous red or blue shifts?, realm of c’s, etc)
    1. Statistical Mechanics <— Mode Shifting Statistical Mechanics associated with a given investigation
  8. Bayesian Analytics <— Integrates belief systems into interpretative analysis before, during, and after investigations (great for education roadmap creation)
  9. Heuristics <— A practical method that is not guaranteed to be optimal nor perfect but which is nevertheless sufficient for reaching an immediate, short-term goal
  10. Metacognitive Analytics <— Awareness of investigator’s own thought processes and establishing an understanding of the patterns behind them.
  11. Six Sigma <— Quality management metrics (NOTE: must be done internally relative to and respective of each EIM then again holistically across analytic stacks)
Einstein stating his belief that mass is invariant.

The Emergence Model
- Architectures of Mass
- Atomic Architecture
- The Concept of Mass, by Lev B Okun
- Entanglement Gradient, in both convergence and emergence vectors
  - Gravitons
  - Magnetons
  - Preons
    - Particle Mass vs Quark Mass reconciled as Preons damping quark constituents (NOTE: It is with some irony that we note that the Preon Mass to Quark Mass ratio is essentially the same as dark matter to normal matter ratios found in nature).
- Frangibility
- M5 and M6
  - Most Basic Particles (MBPs)
- Propositions
- Reference Frames:
  - Event Frames
    - EFPS1: Cascade to Severance
    - EFPS2: Geodesic Cruise
    - EFPS3: Capture
    - EFPS4: Interactive Feedback & Resonance
    - EFPS5: Max Q
    - EFPS6: Subsidence (e.g. normalization)
    - EFPS7: Endurance
  - Local Frames
- Severance
- Speed of Entanglement
- Thought Experiments
User Library

Never present insights absent the means by which they were developed.

P2.0 Illumination Phase

The general purpose and mission of this phase is to enable effective mode shifting to established compliance standards. It is vitally important to seek the capacity to distinguish our thinking between EIM derived principled laws and actual laws of nature. Remember the actual real universe is unified, whether or not your thinking about it is. If our thinking about the unified Universe does not close to unification then it is our thinking that is flawed, not that of the universe.

Key Insights from Original Systems Review

Many concepts simply evaporate as logic artifacts resulting from EIMs that do not close to unification. Concepts like the multiverse, and time travel simply do not withstand the associated rigor of the process. For the first time in history reference frames may now employ a common real geometric basis point for every real object in every frame. MBPs, or any set of them may act as the geometric basis of any reference frame.

Antimatter reconciled as architectural destructive phase opposite that of (aka) normal matter.
The unified Universe can be characterized Bang to Bang
Dark Matter reconciled as a function of Architectures of Mass Interacting relative to and respective of specific configurations, their entanglement saturation and entanglement density
Drake Equation – Fermi Paradox reconciled. Life is likely replete but interstellar travel is highly improbable. JWST findings are consistent with this reconciliation model.
Economics reconciled via Human Action
The Emergence Model of Particle Physics mode shifts all Standard Model particles into alignment with the unified Universe and is reflected by the entanglement gradient in both convergence and emergence vectors
Inflationary Theory is dismantled through elimination of corollary to rapid expansion after the Big Bang in favor of Bang to Bang perspective
- this same effort also eliminates z-factors associated with the expansion of spacetime and vindicates Edwin P Hubble’s body of work
- both the age and size of the portion of our part of the unified Universe inside our particle horizon grows in both age and extent
Mathematical value calculations are highly dependent on Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs) manifesting specific relationships and patterns as a function of their respective context domains
Particle-Wave Duality is reconciled through M5’s Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance
- the same reconciliation also reconciles two-slit experiments and other spectroscopy phenomena (i.e. Glory Aircraft Experiment)
Reference Frames:
- Event Frame – Interacting real objects
- Local Frame – Real objects interacting only with themselves and isolated/insulated by space (as defined by The Emergence Model)
Speed of Light mode shifts resulting in
- the constant ‘c’ being reassigned to Severance, the velocity value remains intact, but why it is true changes
- Interferometer experiments repositioned as local phenomena
- being a function of the Electron–Photon system where emissions are a function of centripetal force
- is a local frame function of the system producing emissions and cosmological velocity governed by Rapidity
Systems Engineering
- Logical Systems
- Real Systems
- Logical Views and Real Views (of the same system)
- Abstraction Inventory (See ISO 9001 Unification Tool)
Time defined as an action displacement index

P3.0 Analysis Phase

Nothing real can transition the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy, therefore all EIMs employing these constructs are essentially logical in their nature. Therefore, status quo thinking modeling reality will never close to unification.
Empirical declaration due to repeatability absent realm of c compliance, especially ‘closure’ with the unified Universe, fails the mode shifted Baloney Detection Kit criteria to avoid declaration.