Emergence Model Propositions
The Emergence Model propositions are axioms consistent with the realm of c’s, based on insights derived either internally to a given encapsulated interpretive model of the Universe or they are holistically derived and specific to EIMs closing to unification. Today that usually means M5, but may equally apply to M6. To be clear. Elegant Reasonism is the epistemology supported by an analytical framework which seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science. It is that epistemology and its utility processes which produced The Emergence Model. These propositions are a result of that analytical rigor and discipline conducted as part of the original systems review.
EIM Cautions
The Emergence Model is an EIM like any other, excepting that it is fully compliant and happens to close to unification. The caution for the reader here is not to take these propositions as derived from the unified Universe and therefore “the” propositions of the actual real unified Universe. The fine line and distinction being drawn here is that EIMs in Elegant Reasonism are positioned to ‘reflect’ the actual real unified Universe. The actual real unified Universe is always held distinct and litmus. We try very hard not to say we are giving you ‘the’ actual description of that reality. Rather we are characterizing a reflection of it and as it happens it has great affinity with what we find in nature. Many will have difficulty with this fine distinction but what we are trying to avoid is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors. Making those mistakes or errors is exactly what got us where we were circa 2020. So avoiding such errors is one point to be made here. The other point to be made concerns mistaking the dominance of The Emergence Model as the be all end all EIM, and to be crystal clear – it is not that. It is simply a way and manner of thinking which happens to close to unification. And the point being made is not to assume that there may never be an EIM developed which is better than The Emergence Model. There may be. We just don’t know what it is yet. That does not mean someone may never figure one out.
Emergence Model Propositions
The list of propositions below are those arising from the original systems review that heavily influenced the development of The Emergence Model. The propositions are not simple declarations they are reverse engineered as a result of multiple concept reviews in context of developing what became the EIMs which are holistically represented as The Emergence Model. The order and enumeration of this list is completely meaningless and otherwise arbitrary. They appear in this order because that is the order in which they wound up being documented in our original note files. We simply did no further sorting or arranging of the items in the list.
List of Propositions
Below is a list of incrementally enumerated propositions.
| Proposition | Proposition | Related Concepts |
|---|---|---|
| 0001 | Gravity is a geometric function of matter not the medium in which it sits | Mn |
| 0002 | Albert Einstein, his theories and field equations are logically correct | Mn |
| 0003 | The velocity of light has no imposed limit | Mn |
| 0004 | All singularities (Black Holes) are finite | Mn |
| 0005 |  is Finite |
Mn |
| 0006 | Singularities ‘evaporate’ particles particles back into the interstellar medium | Mn |
| 0007 | The medium of space is not constrained by any singularity | Mn |
| 0008 | Space is Nothing | M5 |
| 0009 | Space is Dimensionless | M5 |
| 0010 | Structures of Most Basic Particles equals Properties | Mn |
| 0011 | Most Basic Particles and configurations of them are responsible for all Force | Mn |
| 0012 | The medium of space is Isotropic | Mn |
| 0013 | The medium of space is not isometric consistent with Proposition 0028 | P0028 |
| 0014 | Geometric basis of real objects are MBPs or some configured set of them | Mn |
| 0015 | The real geometric basis of matter is intrinsic to its architectural mass | Mn |
| 0016 | Mass is the geometric basis of the fundamental forces | Mn |
| 0017 | Structure equals properties | M5 |
| 0018 | Particles comprise all realms of existence both visible and invisible | Mn |
| 0019 | All structures are comprised of entangled Most Basic Particles (MBPs) | Mn |
| 0020 | Both Observables and Non-Observables are Configurations of MBPs | M5 |
| 0021 | Perception is the threshold between observable and non-observable | Mn |
| 0022 | The set of non-observables in the Universe must be deduced | Mn |
| 0023 | Particles Exhibiting Partial Physical Attributes Are Likely Hybrid Particles | M5 |
| 0024 | Everything Real is comprised of continuums entangled MBP structures | M5 |
| 0025 | Our focus must shift away from the medium and onto what is in it | Mn |
| 0026 | All matter and radiation have geometric architecture intrinsically possessing mass | Mn |
| 0027 | Space has no attributable character other than being dimensionless nothing | P0008, P0009 |
| 0028 | See Proposition 9 | P0009 |
| 0029 | Entanglement is the fundamental method of structure building | Mn |
| 0030 | Real Geometry, Requires A Real Basis Point | M5 |
| 0031 | Mechanical descriptions must be ascribed as either a logical view or a physical view (See Systems Engineering) | Mn |
| 0032 | General & Special Relativity represent a logical view of the Universe | Mn |
| 0033 | Spacetime is a logical systems construct and not a physical view | Mn |
| 0034 | Abstraction layers compartmentalize orders of entanglement | Mn |
| 0035 | Abstraction models represent integrated mass models | Mn |
| 0036 | Abstraction structures can be nested within other abstractions | Mn |
| 0037 | Abstraction structures can be attached to higher ordered structures and constructs | Mn |
| 0038 | Abstraction structures have internal structures that scale to reflect the logical unified Universe | Mn |
| 0039 | Any deduced characterization describes a construct of logic | Mn |
| 0040 | Any equation describing real systems characterizes a Reality Structure | Mn |
| 0041 | All equations must inherently integrate structure as a consideration (e.g. Architecture) | Mn |
| 0042 | Particle Energy re: Action, Vector across Event Frame Phase Steps | Mn |
| 0043 | Linear Momentum of a Particle | Mn |
| 0044 | Angular Momentum of a Particle | Mn |
| 0045 | Electric Potential (voltage) of an Event | Mn |
| 0046 | Magnetic Potential (A) at an Event | Mn |
| 0047 | Electric Field (E) at an Event | Mn |
| 0048 | Magnetic induction (B) at an Event | Mn |
| 0049 | M0 Gravitational Potential at an Event relative to architectural mass participants | Mn |
| 0050 | Speed of Entanglement Revisited (and Bell Inequality Experiments) 10K to 54K of M1 defined ‘c’ {NOTE: ‘c’ mode shift to Severance under M5} Also see | P0003 |
| 0051 | Set Theory can be used to investigate structures & properties | Mn |
| 0052 | Ordered & architectural structures comprised of MBPs are fractals | Mn |
| 0053 | MBPs possessing energy above the Severance threshold will not entangle | Mn |
| 0054 | Only State One (1) MBPs will entangle | Mn |
| 0055 | Severance, by definition, for individual MBPs is metacognitively infinite (e.g. it’s indivisible) | Mn |
| 0056 | Enthalpy describes the total energy in all systems | Mn |
| 0057 | Infinite Compression Does NOT Exist in Nature | M5 |
| 0058 | Singularities grow in size and mass | Mn |
| 0059 | Singularities internalize architectures of mass | Mn |
| 0060 | No force exists absent an MBP or ‘configuration mechanism’ to carry it | Mn |
| 0061 | The set of holistic implications here unify physics | Mn |
| 0062 | The Emergence Model, is “why” Newton’s Laws of Motion are true | Mn |
| 0063 | Hydrogen and Helium originated shortly after the Big Bang | Mn |
| 0064 | Nucleosynthesis is responsible for non-big bang elements | Mn |
| 0065 | White Dwarf class stars are partly responsible for dispersal of elements | Mn |
| 0066 | Cherenkov radiation connects Quantum Mechanics & Cosmology | Mn |
| 0067 | The Big Bang was instigated by colliding singularities consistent with Concept 0292 | C0292 |
| 0068 | Photon frequency is a manifestation of the particle’s dy component | Mn |
| 0069 | Time is a second-order phenomena (e.g. it is an Action Displacement Index) | Mn |
| 0070 | Elements on Earth crossed interstellar distance to get here | Mn |
| 0071 | The age of the must accommodate elemental travel |
Mn |
| 0072 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0073 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0074 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0075 | Any state change of a system is an act | Mn |
| 0076 | Fundamental entanglement is described by mathematical integration of mass | Mn |
| 0077 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0078 | Measuring anything real is a function of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance | Mn |
| 0079 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0080 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0081 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0082 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0083 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0084 | Event Frames are scale invariant and space is isotropic | P0012 |
| 0085 | Similar phenomena will yield similar results regardless of location | Mn |
| 0086 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0087 | Reality structures follow Table 36 as a function of their Table 3 architecture | Mn |
| 0088 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0089 | The Hamiltonian describes the total energy of an uninfluenced system in EFPS2 | Mn |
| 0090 | Physical interaction must be described in the context of Concept 0289: Mass | C0289 |
| 0091 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0092 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0093 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0094 | Merging material during EFPS5 exhibits proportional behavior that is scale invariant | Mn |
| 0095 | Scenarios exhibiting material behavior congruent with a given state are in that state | Mn |
| 0096 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0097 | Absence of evidence is NOT evidence of absence | Mn |
| 0098 | Geologic symmetry persists unless altered by another force | Mn |
| 0099 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0100 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0101 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0102 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0103 | Architectural harmonics of architectural configurations of mass is why Concept 0117 is true | C0117 |
| 0104 | Virtual particles comprise unique substructures within The Standard Model | Mn |
| 0105 | All components of architectural mass contribute to an objects momentum | Mn |
| 0106 | The photon’s frequency lever arm always points along its relative geodesic (vector) | Mn |
| 0107 | The photon’s lever arm is equal to its wavelength | Mn |
| 0108 | Absolute location requires a frame of reference whose basis is matter | Mn |
| 0109 | All magnets have size | Mn |
| 0110 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0111 | The spherical nature of the heliosheath represents its rest volume | Mn |
| 0112 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0113 | Energy is a function of intrinsic, fundamental motion | Mn |
| 0115 | Energy requires the existence of a most basic particle or system of particles | Mn |
| 0116 | If a most basic particle exists, and space is nothing, the universe is a fractal | Mn |
| 0117 | MBP structures responsible for photons all fail at the same Severance energy | Mn |
| 0118 | EFPS1 Severance produces electron-photon particle separation velocities at the speed of light | Mn |
| 0119 | Geodesic velocities in Space (e.g. cosmological) are a function of rapidity | Mn |
| 0120 | Spectroscopic red or blue shift are a function of rapidity | Mn |
| 0121 | The science of spectroscopy describes energy interactions of the unified Universe | Mn |
| 0122 | Electrons emit photons independent of nuclei due to Centripetal Force | Mn |
| 0123 | Spectroscopy describes atomic and molecular mechanical interactions | Mn |
| 0124 | Spectroscopy provides indirect electron to nuclei relationships | Mn |
| 0125 | Electron movement is due to The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance | Mn |
| 0126 | Planck’s constant intrinsically integrates Severance | Mn |
| 0127 | Measurement is an act | Mn |
| 0128 | Acts inherently require motion driven by energy | Mn |
| 0129 | Calculus is an intrinsically energy centric concept requiring action (e.g. integration) | Mn |
| 0130 | Any math absent overt characterization of intrinsic nature is a logical description until so reflected | Mn |
| 0131 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0132 | All mass has at least one complex eigenvalue | Mn |
| 0133 | Architectural mass is a vector quantity | Mn |
| 0134 | Congruent phenomena must be accompanied with its modulo | Mn |
| 0135 | Eigenvectors can characterize Event Frame Phase Step Energy Flow | Mn |
| 0136 | Recognized particles are likely ‘composite knots’ See also Knot Theory | Mn |
| 0137 | If the smallest rope segment is 2 two entangled MBPs then required rope lengths of integer segment units in knot invariants are individual MBPs (e.g. the MBP is the quintessential integer). | Mn |
| 0138 | MBPs in an Unknot represent either an ‘integer’ segment or integer rope length | Mn |
| 0139 | An MBP represents a ‘fractal initiator’, bounded set, in Fractal Geometry | Mn |
| 0140 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0141 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0142 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0143 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0144 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0145 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0146 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0147 | Absolute summed mass of Concept 0289 is an entangled structure | Mn |
| 0148 | Generally mass may have both observable & non-observable constituents | Mn |
| 0149 | Physical properties infer intrinsic structure | M5 |
| 0150 | Concept 0292 has example astronomical observations calling for a collision class of events | Mn |
| 0151 | Energy is variant under Special Relativity | Mn |
| 0152 | Variables substituted for for mass retain the vector quantity | Mn |
| 0153 | Momentum is variant under Special Relativity | Mn |
| 0154 | Mass is invariant under Special Relativity | Mn |
| 0155 | Mass is a vector quantity under Special Relativity | Mn |
| 0156 | State changes in matter are a function of the enthalpy of its mass | Mn |
| 0157 | All force is the work instantiated by the action of the architecture of relative and respective mass | Mn |
| 0158 | Every system, both logical and physical, has an associated Reality Structure | Mn |
| 0159 | Electromagnetic potential is a probability function of derivative structures | Mn |
| 0160 | Energy is ability of MBP configurations to accomplish work | Mn |
| 0161 | Time is a derivative of entanglement given by Concept 0402 | Mn |
| 0162 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0163 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0164 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0165 | Proposition | Mn |
| 0166 | Magnetic anomoloy data may be a function of Event material sorting | Mn |
| 0167 | It is possible to manipulate the realm of non-observables | Mn |
| 0168 | Action is a first order phenomena | Mn |
| 0169 | Proposition | Mn |
Shop Now!
Restricted content
$0.00 Add to cartThe Elegant Reasoner Owl Mug White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsParmenides Father of Ontology White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsKarma Frog White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsMode Shift Reminder Mug with Color Inside
$14.95 Select optionsMode Shift It 1st Mug with Color Inside
$14.95 Select optionsElegant Reasonism – Mode Shift The Game! Embroidered Polo Shirt
$21.50 – $24.00 Select optionsElegant Reasonism Mode Shifts The Game Mug with Color Inside
$14.95 Select optionsAre you working with reality or abstractions of it? White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsInsights
$89.95 Add to cartElegant Reasonism PDCF & Translation Matrices Stickers on one Sticker sheet
$7.45 Add to cartElegant Reasonism Translation Matrices Bubble-free stickers
$3.20 – $3.60 Select optionsElegant Reasonism Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart Bubble-free stickers
$3.20 – $3.60 Select optionsM6 EIM Team 3/4 sleeve raglan shirt
$24.50 – $26.00 Select optionsM5 EIM Team 3/4 sleeve raglan shirt
$24.50 – $26.00 Select options
