Elegant Reasonism Mode Shifting

Early in the development of what has become patent pending 16405134 Elegant Reasonism, it became clear that we were not ‘tweaking’ facets of predominant thinking in order to accomplish the goal of unification. We were “gang switching paradigms” that established fundamental modes of thinking and context. Indeed entire patterns of how we thought about aspects of reality, as defined by Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs) were being wholesale shifted EIM to EIM.This is not just switching intersecting cells within the 2D Artiulation Layer between paradigms of interest relative to and respective of employed EIMs, it includes all associated evidence chains down through the analytic stack of Translation Matrices. Indeed it is changing an entire associated mode of thought/thinking. Hence its label/name.

Effective mode shifting almost always requires cognitive dissonance in order to ask very hard questions regarding the ability to effectively navigate the utility process, framework or any metrics associated with the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart.

The objective is recognizing a given Paradigm Of Interest/Nature (POI/N) in fully compliant context of the unified Universe.

These dynamics in modes of thinking became known as ‘mode shifting‘ and refers to all aspects associated with contextual changes between and across encapsulated interpretive models. Mode Shifting in Elegant Reasonism is fundamentally enabled in the framework by tools, especially Translation Matrices. Changing the ‘context of thought’ is neither trivial nor trite and deployment managers are encouraged to employ knowledge management practices and do so transformationally. Critical Situationally Aware Thinking is vital in the enabling process. The evolution of thought along these lines ultimately became “Mode Shifting” or ‘mode switching’. Exactly because insights are intrinsically coupled to and between the sets of Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs) employed by a given investigation, it is important for consumers of the investigative results to know how the original investigators established that context. Consequently, these requirements bear down directly during development of the ultimate Treatise produced.

• Models of the Universe are distinct and discrete
• Models of the Universe manifest context through foundational constructs and concepts
• Models of the Universe are ‘encapsulated’

Introduction to Mode Shifting

If you would like to flip through the presentation charts online then click the title immediately above. If you want to hear McGowen speak to those charts then watch the video below.

 

Elegant Reasonism rules are as they are exactly because of these observations. Systems Engineering tells us that there are many ways to accomplish both logical and physical views of systems producing the same results. The succinct implication of this insight has to do with this fact from information science. Exactly because models manifest 100% of all phenomena of nature they must be considered ‘encapsulated’, Recognizing the implications of Langer Epistemology Errors we realize that different models will have different relationship patterns which manifest essentially the same perceived phenomena. That means that model to model comparisons must “gang switch” 100% of all paradigms in order achieve juxtaposition relative to those ‘paradigms of interest’ or ‘paradigms of nature’ (e.g. physical phenomena).

Because we are shifting fundamental modes of thought when we ‘reconnect’ paradigms representing manifestation of relationships yielding the same physical phenomena model to model, we must have a new way to refer to this capability. We call this capability ‘Mode Shifting“.

Mode Shifting then is a way of articulating how a given paradigm of nature or an investigative paradigm of interest contextually changes model to model. Simplistically this is relatively easy to state, but it is incredibly difficult to accomplish. During the development of The Emergence Model, we had to develop some 400 equations forming what we are now referring to as an ‘equation sieve’ each formula of which had to be mode shifted across the recognized models. Even mode shifting something like Einstein‘s mass energy equation is difficult, but it is necessary in order to assure the integrity of thinking associated with a given investigation.

Process & Methods

Technically enabling mode shifting occurs in Phase 2: Recognition of the Generalized Process Flow but the nature of Elegant Reasonism is its recursiveness.

• Phase 1.0 – Recognition
• Phase 2.0 – Illumination
• Phase 3.0 – Analysis

Concept Sieves

Currently we have three concept sieves being installed within the content body of this website.

• EMCS01: Original Systems Review Concepts
• EMCS02: Physical Properties
• EMCS03: Thermodynamics

So far 100% of all concepts tested “mode shift” with little effort across the entire entanglement gradient (e.g. smallest scale to largest).

Understanding How to Enable Mode Shifting

Completing the necessary tasks associated with effective Translation Matrices analytics which enable mode shifting may require education exactly due to the interdisciplinary requirements imposed by unification criteria. It is important to note that there are distinct types of investigations and they should not be confused. Development of a new EIM compliant with the realm of c’s constitutes one type and was undertaken during our original systems review. That particular quest spanned almost two decades and consumed more paradigm shifts than we care to count. The second type of investigation centers on your own systems review leveraging what has already been accomplished. At some point in the future a curricula similar to our example will likely exist.

Justifying Investigative Insights

Understand that mode shifted insights are developed by the investigative team who already understand the utility process and framework supporting the epistemology seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe, but your audience to whom you have to defend those insights will likely not understand any of that. The implication is that there will be no basis for effective communications. See In Unification’s Wake, Part 03: Communications. For all the reasons that EIMs are not generally recognizable from each other, insights developed by one must be mode shifted for recognition from another EIM‘s perspective. EIMs preresent completely different manners for considering the same Paradigm Of Interest/Nature (POI/N).

Justification of insights must be contemporaneous with cognizance of the process, framework and epistemology used to develop them.

Mode Shifting Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Shop Now

 

#Unification #ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #ModeShifting #EIM #M1 #M2 #M3 #M4 #M5 #M6