Energy Signatures That Go Bang

The Entanglement Gradient has Event Frame interaction permutations characterized as points within/along an Energy Signature Taxonomy gradient where after Primarily Merged we find Bang.  Energy signatures that go ‘bang’ are those that provide for the discussion in our article Bang to Bang, where we describe sequentially sequenced ‘Big Bangs’. A proper formal discussion on this topic is at the moment beyond the scope of this single page. However, what we can do is outline an Elegant Reasonism based utility process employing technologies to assess data already gathered and in hand so we may discuss issues Encapsulated Interpretive Model (EIM) by EIM. Remember that under Elegant Reasonism Rules one of those EIMs must close to unification as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science and we remind the readers here that the M1 History of the Universe depicted below does not close to unification and consequently we must mode shift that image. In the end of this outline we will form enough insight to posit a mode shifted Treatise albeit simplex in its basis.

M1 History of the Universe

The traditional view of the Big Bang, fraught with Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs), is depicted below.

This preamble area should contain a brief synopsis of intended content.

P1.0: Recognition

Insights Required for Recogntion

Insights may be from any area from the body of work conducted to date documented and defined across and & all EIMs. Specific abstraction terms should be documented within the ISO 9001 Unification Tool. Images and video materials may also be used. Steps should be taken when links out to external resources are used that those materials are not interfered with. Material employed should be in the public domain or comply with applicable and appropriate law.

Abstraction Inventory

• Recognition of The Emergence Model in full context of Elegant Reasonism across the entire entanglement gradient in both emergent and convergent vectors.
• Elementary mode shifting M1, M2, M4, and M5 with an understanding of why M6 is not yet mature enough to explore
  • Cognition of Langer Epistemology Errors  (LEEs) and implications relative to and respective of logical views of physical systems in context of historical empiricism by human physiology.
  • Recognition that spacetime is a logical construct not a physical construct
  • Cognition of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance  under such conditions of Severance results in the Architecture of all Mass being Frangible
    • Supported by EMCS01, Propositions, and Thought Experiments
  • Mode shifting:
    • ‘c’ from speed of light definition and to Severance resulting in the same velocity
      • Synchrotron Radiation implications re: centrepital force in context of architectural [of mass] entanglement
    • Interferometers
    • Particle Model including Warped Spacetime to Graviton Architecture Action
    • Lambda CDM
    • WMAP
    • z-factor
    • Inflationary Theory
    • Black Holes
    • Dismantling M1 rules, specifically eliminating restrictions on the velocity of light
      • Vindicates: Hubble, Bell, Anomoloius atomic Red & Blue Shifts as well as cosmological data including WMAP & z-factors
  • Cognition of Energy Signature Taxonomy

Historical Constructs by EIM

All EIMs employing the spacetime construct (e.g. M1, M2, & M3) are fundamentally logical in nature supported by a different physical view instantiating them (e.g. M6 via M4).

1. 1. 1. Nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy.
      2. A historical interpretive review of the abstractions involved and their various implications suggest commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs).
      3. Systems Engineering precepts, practices, processes and the SEBoK (linked below) demonstrate requirements and data gathering techniques under conditions where some set of circumstances create situations that may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

Major Domains of Discourse by EIM

Domains of Discourse include but are not limited to:

1. Elegant Reasonism
2. The Emergence Model
3. EIM Investigations
4. Supernovae Events  <– Segregate Collision Class Events (e.g. mini-Bangs)
5. Objects like BX442

Historical Experiments

1. Logically correct,
2. May be mode shifted into alignment with M5 consistent with Elegant Reasonism processes & methods,
3. Mode Shifting the traditional view of the Big Bang, along with the WMAP project as well as its data, re-positions the Lambda CDM model in context of The Emergence Model dismantles the Inflationary Theory and yields The Emergence Model‘s Bang to Bang perspective.

SolREI’s Original Systems Review

1. Mode Shifts the constant ‘c’:
   1. Under M1 is defined as ‘the speed of light‘
   2. Under M5 is defined as ‘the velocity of a photon produced by a system in an Event Frame predominantly described under EFPS1 at the threshold of Severance.’
      1. Cosmologically this results in Spectroscopic Red & Blue Shifts reporting actual Geodesic Photon Rapidity (e.g. Concept 168) under EMCS01.
      2. Mode Shifting ‘c’ in this manner fundamentally disintermediates conceiving spacetime as a physical construct and further substantiates M1 commission of LEEs.
   3. The original systems review found this proposition dovetailed with The Emergence Model reflecting the unified Universe held litmus.

Reference Materials

All of the reference materials below are augmented by the User Library on this system. The acknowledgements page also serves direct links to biographical folders in that library. Also linked and integrated are pages for:

• Einstein, Albert
• Langer, Susanne K
• Okun, Lev B

Original Systems Review Notes

ORCID References will include the same as those listed below. WorldCat will also include these manuscripts.

• ISBN: 978-0977229222 – On The Nature of Space, 1st Edition
• ISBN: 978-0977229239 – Elegance of Reason: Discerning Patterns of Earth’s Emergence, 5th Edition v042  <— Primary System Review Notes
  
• ISBN: 978-1946009043 – The Emergence Model, M5: The Logical View
• ISBN: 978-1946009067 – Elegance of Reason: Translating Models General Approaches
• ISBN: 978-1946009920 – On The Nature of Space, 2nd Edition, 2017
• ISBN: 978-1946009975 – Cognition of the Universe’s Realm

Network Resources

• Article: Resources
• Article: Wood (Putting wood behind the arrow)
• Concept Sieves
  • EMCS01: Original Systems Review Concepts Investigated (403+ equations)
  • EMCS02: Physical Property Review (60+ physical properties)
  • EMCS03: Thermodynamics Review (Not part of the original systems review)
• Elegant Reasonism Press Release: Unification Accomplished
• ISO 9001 Unification Tool
• SolREI’s NASA/ADS Library
• Presentations
  • Elegant Reasonism Introduction Series
    • Part 01: Introduction and Overview
    • Part 02: Introduction to Mode Shifting
    • Part 03: Mode Shifting the Baloney Detection Kit
  • In Unification’s Wake Series
    • Part 01: Stereotypical Questions  <– References Key Insights below
    • Part 02: Mathematical Proofs
    • Part 03: Communications
    • Part 04: Relatedness
    • Part 05: Business Impact
• Press Release: Unification Accomplished!
• Software Repository
• SolREI Studios Channel (On YouTube)
• User Library
• Videos
• White Papers
  • Elegant Reasonism
  • The Emergence Model

Historical References

Students and investigators should note that it is not fair to judge any of these historical or any of the the User LIbrary reference materials by modern information sciences standards. That would constitute ‘moving the goal post’ and is generally prohibited by Elegant Reasonism. The idea here is to present the thinking, at the time, by that original author. Where this specifically comes into affect is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs); which to make this point salient was first quantified by Susanne K Langer in 1948 and codified by SolREI INC. Another facet of unraveling historical points of view relative to requirements of unification are both logical and physical views in context both Systems Engineering and of LEEs. Subsequent to this contextual update in our thinking we are then required to employ critical situational awareness thinking that something may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

“We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them.”, ~ Albert Einstein

• Guide to Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBok)  <– Systems Engineering
• Special and General Relativity, by Albert Einstein  <– Relativity
• Matter and Motion, by James Clerk Maxwell
• Philosophy In A New Key, by Susanne K Langer  <— Genesis of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs)
• Spacetime-Structure, by Erwin Schrodinger
• The Concept of Mass by Lev B Okun  <– Segregates M1 & M2
• The Death of Schrodinger’s Cat  <– Dismantles wave function
• The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, by S. W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis
• The Nature of Space and Time, by Stephen Hawking

P2.0: Illumination

Illuminating the various EIMs and construct manifestations (e.g. instantiation for those constructs) and the philosophical nature recognized entering science we must recognize the fundamental validity of assertions being asserted. This requires us to ask and answer some very difficult questions relative to and respective of the perspectives established by each EIM within a fully compliant and valid 2D Articulation Frame in preparation of the next phase of the process & methods leveraging fully compliant Translation Matrices.

Supporting Concepts

• EMCS01: Original Systems Review Concept Sieve
• EMCS02: Original Systems Review Physical Property Concept Sieve
• EMCS03: Thermodynamics

Supporting Propositions

The proposition here is supported by, but not limited to, those propositions listed below:

• Proposition 0001: Gravity is a geometric function of matter not the medium in which it sits
• Proposition 0002: Albert Einstein, his theories and field equations are logically correct
• Proposition 0004: All singularities (Black Holes) are finite
• Proposition 0007: The medium of space is not constrained by any singularity
• Proposition 0008: Space is Nothing
• Proposition 0009: Space is Dimensionless
• Proposition 0010: Structures of Most Basic Particles equals Properties
• Proposition 0011: Most Basic Particles and configurations of them are responsible for all Force
• Proposition 0012: The medium of space is Isotropic
• Proposition 0013: The medium of space is not isometric consistent with Proposition 0028
• Proposition 0014: Geometric basis of real objects are MBPs or some configured set of them
• Proposition 0015: The real geometric basis of matter is intrinsic to its architectural mass
• Proposition 0016: Mass is the geometric basis of the fundamental forces
• Proposition 0017: Structure equals properties
• Proposition 0018: Particles comprise all realms of existence both visible and invisible
• Proposition 0028: See Proposition 0009
• Proposition 0029: Entanglement is the fundamental method of structure building
• Proposition 0030: Real Geometry, Requires A Real Basis Point
• Proposition 0032: General & Special Relativity represent a logical view of the Universe
• Proposition 0033: Spacetime is a logical systems construct and not a physical view
• Proposition 0035: Abstraction models represent integrated mass models

Supporting Thought Experiments

• Thought Experiment 0004: Something vs Nothing
• Thought Experiment 0005: The Geometric Basis of “Space”
• Thought Experiment 0006: The Relative View of General & Special Relativity: Logical vs Physical
• Thought Experiment 0007: Tension
• Thought Experiment 0013: The Black Hole Information Paradox
• Thought Experiment 0014: Quantum Fluctuations in Finite Regions of Space
• Thought Experiment 0015: Universal Expansion: Popping The Balloon
• Thought Experiment 0018: Is Gravity the same everywhere on Earth?
• Thought Experiment 0027: A Blended View of Matter
• Thought Experiment 0028: The Cage

Illumination FAQs

This section should link to the FAQs page for this particular concept or proposition page and should detail the most common questions about it. The idea being that someone might want to simply read those Q&As rather than wade through the detail here and putting those on their own page allows this page to be more concise.

P3.0: Analysis

The process and methods worked through the various analytical layers of Translation Matrices to produce the insights listed above in the recognition phase of the original systems review notes all lnked above..

P3.9 Development of Final Treatise

The idea behind this section is illuminating insights that do not become visible until effective mode shifting has been enabled and ‘clean’ navigation of the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart has been achieved/accomplished.

Treatise

(M5) A more comprehensive systems review is needed than we have had resources to conduct; however, there is enough we have accomplished in order to demonstrate Elegant Reasonism and The Emergence Model fundamentals. Concept Sieves EMCS01 and EMCS02 mode shifted our original systems review to our satisfaction within established standards consistent with our goals and objectives. Others may want a more formal systems review and they are free to pursue that as they determine appropriate. Our notes are available through this website to all of civilization for anyone to follow. The astronomical inventory illustrates existing mini-bang candidates suggesting that the Bang to Bang point of view is correct and also consistent with the Energy Signature Taxonomy which is also consistent across the Sol System and consistent with the entanglement gradient both from the emergence vector as well as the convergence vector. Because these various concepts all holistically dove tail our tendency is to support the various premises asserted here and we find them to be consistent with the mode shifted Baloney Detection Kit.

 

 

Shop Now!

 

#ElegantReasonism #Unification #EIM #EmergenceModel #EventFrame #EnergySignature #Taxonomy #Perimeters #BangToBang #Bang #CollisionClass #Astronomy #Cosmology