Albert Einstein, his theories and field equations are logically correct
While the path to this proposition is straight forward, and status quo thinking is required to agree with it, in a mature information sciences context the implications of this logically correct proposition become significantly more important than the historical evidence may otherwise suggest. This previous sentence is exactly correct because something can be logically correct yet remain physically different. When we fully comprehend the implications of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs), abstractions and their usage, we come face to face with some hard realities. Such errors occur when we mistake abstractions for actual reality. The trick is to know when and if you are making them.
P1.0: Recognition
What Albert Einstein created through his body of work is absolutely 100% logically correct, and therein lay the strategic clue needed in order to gain the precipice of unification.
We humans employ abstractions in everything we do, every day. Humans commit Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) naturally every day.

Human physiology predisposes civilization to commission of LEEs.
Knowing vs Understanding and wielding philosophy and science in a manner illuminates and illustrates the path to an epistemology consistent with the unified Universe.
Elegant Reasonism is a net new epistemology supported by an analytical framework which seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science and as a utility process produced the first fully compliant Encapsulated Interpretive Model (EIM) to close to unification. This means that those wielding Elegant Reasonism can ask questions that status quo thinkers can not even fathom.
- Unification is a philosophical tapestry a great deal larger than any single domain of discourse, detail set, or discipline.
- Unification criteria necessarily demands that once the unified Universe can be illuminated and illustrated ‘Bang to Bang‘ across the entire entanglement gradient that everything real, no matter how restful, be reflected to industry accepted standards in that context.
Insights Required for Recogntion
- Abstraction Inventory:
- Action
- Architecture
- Arm
- Basis
- Character
- Construct
- Converge / Convergence
- Dimension(s)
- Distance
- Electric
- Electromagnetism
- Energy
- Entanglement
- Epistemology
- Force
- Frame of Reference
- Frequency
- Geometry
- Discontinuity / Discontinuous
- Geometric Map
- Topology
- Gravity
- Instantiate
- Interface
- Langer Epistemology Errors
- Light
- Logic / Logical
- Magnetism
- Mass
- Mathematics
- Constant
- Equation / Formula
- Parameter
- Variable
- Moment
- Nature
- Object
- “Of”
- Phenomena
- Philosophy / Philosophical
- Photon
- Power
- Property
- Real & Reality
- Relation / Relations / Relationship
- Science
- Space
- Speed
- Symbol / Symbolism
- Time
- Vector
- Velocity
- Warp
- Work
- We must remember that historically the problem which Albert Einstein was attempting to solve or reconcile was not unification. The scientific community, at the time, was consumed with the Michelson–Morely Interferometer experiments which had failed to detect the Luminiferous Aether which everyone thought existed. That situation is what Einstein was attempting to reconcile with his various papers. What no one on Earth recognized were the epistemological implications of mistaking abstractions for actual reality and that that is something Susanne K Langer would not quantify and codify until 1948. Then too we have the historical fact that the International Council on Systems Engeering (INCOSE) was not created until 1990. No experimental investigator, anywhere on Earth, recognized the epistemological implications related to commission of these types of errors until SOLREI INC file its application for Elegant Reasonism in 2019 and it was published by the USPTO 26Nov2020 and it was announced via Press Release contemporaneously.
- Circa 2020 humanity has experiments and their results confirming the logical correctness of Special and General Relativity spanning from 1905 through to the present day.
- 100% of all those experiments may be mode shifted.
- All EIMs employing the spacetime construct (e.g. M1, M2, & M3) are fundamentally logical in nature supported by a different physical view instantiating them (e.g. M6 via M4).
- Nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy.
- This fact precludes employing a common geometric basis point for all real objects in the same reference frame, and
- consequently precludes fully coupling all reference frames such that all fundamental forces in those frames can be described relative to one another.
- A historical interpretive review of the abstractions involved and their various implications suggest commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs).
- Systems Engineering precepts, practices, processes and the SEBoK (linked below) demonstrate requirements and data gathering techniques under conditions where some set of circumstances create situations that may be logically correct yet remain physically different.
- Nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy.
- Domains of Discourse include but are not limited to:
- EIMs: M1, M2, M4, M5, M6
- Core constructs and their original manifestation/creation contexts
- Science of Mathematics
- Euler’s Concepts Relative to String Theory, Convergence, Polar Residue Emergence as a Phenomena
- Beta Function <– Convergence
- Gamma Function <– Polar Residue Emergence
- Â Geometry
- Basis Points
- Topology
- Basis
- Geometric Maps (The Emergence Model insights suggest The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance configures MBPs into complex, discontinuous, Architectures of Mass which can be completely described by geometric maps employing a single basis point with any reference frame Event or Local in their intrinsic nature.)
- Knot Theory
- Euler’s Concepts Relative to String Theory, Convergence, Polar Residue Emergence as a Phenomena
- Astrophysics
- Reference Frames
- Intertial Frames and their geometric basis
- Spacetime (systems review)
- Reference Frames
- Physics
- General & Special Relativity
- Recognition that under M5 Gravitons are polarized by High Mass-Low Mass interaction areas in full holistic context of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance.
- EIMs: M1, M2, M4, M5, M6
- All historical experiments are:
- Logically correct,
- May be mode shifted into alignment with M5 consistent with Elegant Reasonism processes & methods,
- Mode Shifting the traditional view of the Big Bang, along with the WMAP project as well as its data, re-positions the Lambda CDM model in context of The Emergence Model dismantles the Inflationary Theory and yields The Emergence Model‘s Bang to Bang perspective.
- SolREI’s original systems review:
- Mode Shifts the constant ‘c’:
- Under M1 is defined as ‘the speed of light‘
- Under M5 is defined as ‘the velocity of a photon produced by a system in an Event Frame predominantly described under EFPS1 at the threshold of Severance.’
- Cosmologically this results in Spectroscopic Red & Blue Shifts reporting actual Geodesic Photon Rapidity (e.g. Concept 168) under EMCS01.
- Mode Shifting ‘c’ in this manner fundamentally disintermediates conceiving spacetime as a physical construct and further substantiates M1 commission of LEEs.
- The original systems review found this proposition dovetailed with The Emergence Model reflecting the unified Universe held litmus.
- Mode Shifts the constant ‘c’:
Reference Materials
All of the reference materials below are augmented by the User Library on this system. The acknowledgements page also serves direct links to biographical folders in that library. Also linked and integrated are pages for:
Original Systems Review Notes
ORCID References will include the same as those listed below. WorldCat will also include these manuscripts.
- ISBN: 978-0977229222 – On The Nature of Space, 1st Edition
- ISBN: 978-0977229239 – Elegance of Reason: Discerning Patterns of Earth’s Emergence, 5th Edition v042 <— Primary System Review Notes
- ISBN: 978-1946009043 – The Emergence Model, M5: The Logical View
- ISBN: 978-1946009067 – Elegance of Reason: Translating Models General Approaches
- ISBN: 978-1946009920 – On The Nature of Space, 2nd Edition, 2017
- ISBN: 978-1946009975 – Cognition of the Universe’s Realm
Network Resources
- Article: Resources
- Article: Wood (Putting wood behind the arrow)
- Concept Sieves
- EMCS01: Original Systems Review Concepts Investigated (403+ equations)
- EMCS02: Physical Property Review (60+ physical properties)
- EMCS03: Thermodynamics Review (Not part of the original systems review)
- Elegant Reasonism Press Release: Unification Accomplished
- ISO 9001 Unification Tool
- SolREI’s NASA/ADS Library
- Presentations
- Press Release: Unification Accomplished!
- Software Repository
- SolREI Studios Channel (On YouTube)
- User Library
- Videos
- White Papers
Historical References
Students and investigators should note that it is not fair to judge any of these historical or any of the the User LIbrary reference materials by modern information sciences standards. That would constitute ‘moving the goal post’ and is generally prohibited by Elegant Reasonism. The idea here is to present the thinking, at the time, by that original author. Where this specifically comes into affect is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs); which to make this point salient was first quantified by Susanne K Langer in 1948 and codified by SolREI INC. Another facet of unraveling historical points of view relative to requirements of unification are both logical and physical views in context both Systems Engineering and of LEEs. Subsequent to this contextual update in our thinking we are then required to employ critical situational awareness thinking that something may be logically correct yet remain physically different.
“We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them.”, ~ Albert Einstein
- Guide to Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBok)Â <– Systems Engineering
- Relativity, by Albert Einstein
- Matter and Motion, by James Clerk Maxwell
- Spacetime-Structure, by Erwin Schrodinger
- The Concept of Mass by Lev B Okun <– Segregates M1 & M2
- The Death of Schrodinger’s Cat <– Dismantles wave function into logical considerations not physical in nature
- The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime, by S. W. Hawking and G.F.R. Ellis
- The Nature of Space and Time, by Stephen Hawking
P2.0: Illumination
One factor supporting this proposition is that the original systems review dovetails with the unified Universe held litmus. There is a requirement of accomplishing unification which was never realized until well after the benchmark had been done and it is holistic in nature. The phrase “unification of physics” significantly misses the point of unification. Unifying a single discipline of science is necessary but wholly insufficient to accomplish unification. When the entire unified Universe can be characterized Bang to Bang, one must be able also characterize everything real from the same genesis. Unification is not a single equation, tweak, or update to historical theories. Unification is a tapestry that must describe how everything real is made manifest no matter how restful. That means that credible evidence chains must exist for all real relationships, spanning all scales, across the entire entanglement gradient. Consequently unification must instantiate everything real and because of that the ‘of physics’ point has been dropped from all articulation of what it is we accomplished. It is also why we state: “Unification is a tapestry a great deal larger than any single domain of discourse, detail set, or discipline.”
Supporting Concepts
- EMCS01: Original Systems Review Concept Sieve
- EMCS02: Original Systems Review Physical Property Concept Sieve
- EMCS03: Thermodynamics
Supporting Propositions
The proposition here is supported by, but not limited to, those propositions listed below:
- Proposition 0001: Gravity is a geometric function of matter not the medium in which it sits
- Proposition 0003: The velocity of light has no imposed limit
- Proposition 0004: All singularities (Black Holes) are finite
- Proposition 0007: The medium of space is not constrained by any singularity
- Proposition 0008: Space is Nothing
- Proposition 0009: Space is Dimensionless
- Proposition 0010: Structures of Most Basic Particles equals Properties
- Proposition 0011: Most Basic Particles and configurations of them are responsible for all Force
- Proposition 0012: The medium of space is Isotropic
- Proposition 0013: The medium of space is not isometric consistent with Proposition 0028
- Proposition 0014: Geometric basis of real objects are MBPs or some configured set of them
- Proposition 0015: The real geometric basis of matter is intrinsic to its architectural mass
- Proposition 0016: Mass is the geometric basis of the fundamental forces
- Proposition 0017: Structure equals properties
- Proposition 0018: Particles comprise all realms of existence both visible and invisible
- Proposition 0028: See Proposition 0009
- Proposition 0029: Entanglement is the fundamental method of structure building
- Proposition 0030: Real Geometry, Requires A Real Basis Point
- Proposition 0032: General & Special Relativity represent a logical view of the Universe
- Proposition 0033: Spacetime is a logical systems construct and not a physical view
- Proposition 0035: Abstraction models represent integrated mass models
Supporting Thought Experiments
- Thought Experiment 0004: Something vs Nothing
- Thought Experiment 0005: The Geometric Basis of “Space”
- Thought Experiment 0006: The Relative View of General & Special Relativity: Logical vs Physical
- Thought Experiment 0007: Tension
- Thought Experiment 0013: The Black Hole Information Paradox
- Thought Experiment 0014: Quantum Fluctuations in Finite Regions of Space
- Thought Experiment 0015: Universal Expansion: Popping The Balloon
- Thought Experiment 0018: Is Gravity the same everywhere on Earth?
- Thought Experiment 0027: A Blended View of Matter
- Thought Experiment 0028: The Cage
Proposition-0002 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Please click the paragraph title for the FAQs page for this proposition.
P3.0: Analysis
The process and methods worked through the various analytical layers of Translation Matrices to produce the insights listed above in the recognition phase of the original systems review. Links to those materials are listed above for your review. In total there are over 3,500 pages of materials, equations, concepts, thought experiments, and other propositions all of which dove tail back here.
Treatise
(M5) The issue behind this proposition is essentially one of philosophical recognition of the implications around commission of Langer Epistemology Errors regarding a logically correct EIM. In this particular case those EIMs are: M1, M2, and M3, because they all employ the same core constructs originally developed by Albert Einstein, though mass is treated differently in each as discussed by Dr. Lev B Okun. When we realize that under these EIMs nothing real can transition the spacetime-mass interface we are forced to realize that is the reason no reference frame under them may employ a common geometric basis point as is required by all valid geometries. That single fact relegates those EIMs into the realm of the logical rather than the physical. Furthermore when we begin to drill into the reasons behind the inability of those same EIMs from being able to fully couple all reference frames we run headlong into the same interface issues and for all the same reasons.
We then must holistically integrate Susanne K Langer‘s body of work with the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge. Then we must take into consideration the philosophical discussion presented by Richard P Feynman in his above video but here we immerse that discussion in the context of Elegant Reasonism and the criteria for unification.
(M5) When we realize the logical nature of the traditional EIMs we are liberated beyond measure because it means we are free to investigate other EIMs which do not employ the same constructs manifesting the limitations (e.g. factors inhibiting accomplishing unification). It was that motivation which culminated in the definition for Elegant Reasonism on the White Paper cover. Recognizing the logical correctness of those earlier EIMs does not denegrate them, indeed it elevates them and makes them powerful tools which can leverage and exploit investigations in new, innovative ways. We now also have M4 to surround and immerse investigative concepts and paradigms. So long as we do not forget that we are employing abstractions and we stay on the model side of reflecting the unified Universe.
Shop Now!
#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #M5 #M6 #Unification #Gravity #Matter #ArchitecturalMass #Graviton #MBP #Entanglement #SpeedOfEntanglement #BellInequality #FundamentalEntanglementFunction #FEF #Severance #Proposition0002
Restricted content
$0.00 Add to cartThe Elegant Reasoner Owl Mug White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsParmenides Father of Ontology White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsKarma Frog White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsMode Shift Reminder Mug with Color Inside
$14.95 Select optionsMode Shift It 1st Mug with Color Inside
$14.95 Select optionsElegant Reasonism – Mode Shift The Game! Embroidered Polo Shirt
$21.50 – $24.00 Select optionsElegant Reasonism Mode Shifts The Game Mug with Color Inside
$14.95 Select optionsAre you working with reality or abstractions of it? White glossy mug
$12.95 – $16.95 Select optionsInsights
$89.95 Add to cartElegant Reasonism PDCF & Translation Matrices Stickers on one Sticker sheet
$7.45 Add to cartElegant Reasonism Translation Matrices Bubble-free stickers
$3.20 – $3.60 Select optionsElegant Reasonism Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart Bubble-free stickers
$3.20 – $3.60 Select optionsM6 EIM Team 3/4 sleeve raglan shirt
$24.50 – $26.00 Select optionsM5 EIM Team 3/4 sleeve raglan shirt
$24.50 – $26.00 Select options
You must be logged in to post a comment.