Elegant Reasonism Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

NOTE: Elegant Reasonism is an epistemology supported by a utility process employing an analytical framework which seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science and resulted in the first Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs): The Emergence Model. It is important to understand and distinguish the EIMs from the process that produced them. Each has a distinct set of FAQs associated with them.

Q: Why is Elegant Reasonism needed?
A: The common thread through all of the traditional epistemologies is human physiology. Susanne K Langer points out that the human sense organs instantly furnish abstractions to the human brain via the Central Nervous System (CNS). We humans are therefore predisposed to commit Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs). LEEs occur when we mistake abstractions for actual reality. Elegant Reasonism was designed to minimize and eliminate such epistemological errors. Traditional (i.e. historical) epistemological sources of truth vary. Empiricism, most often used by scientists, depends on repeatability of papers, experiments, and resulting data and for those to be made manifest in turn depend on the common framework provided by human physiology. Elegant Reasonism sources its truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science. Another answer is that status quo thinking can not close to unification. Elegant Reasonism requires and demands a plurality of EIMs be employed in any given investigation and at least one of them must close to unification in order to meet the predicate priority consideration requirement. The second part of the answer to this question is that traditional thinking and processes not only do not close to unifiction, they never will and will show you why that is true.

Q: Is there a clear path for Elegant Reasonism to be viewed as an epistemology?
A: We contend that a clear path to epistemological considerations exists to a greater extent than do some of the historical and traditional epistemologies. As we continue to work integrating information from our original systems review our ability to articulate these various issues will improve clarity on this subject. All of this remains very new at this point. Superficially, the simplex answer is that there are clear evidence chains across the entire entanglement gradient both from an emergent vector point of view as well as a convergent vector point of view which manifest the Central Nervous System (CNS) and Brain even to the extent of the Brodmann Areas. Philosophically then we have evidence chains linking together human physiology supporting epistemological consolidation all the way to the intrinsic nature of the core constructs of the EIM producing them (e.g. The Emergence Model). We believe that material is compelling.

Q: What expert agrees with any of this?
A: We would love to talk to another expert that has accomplished unification. So far we have not found that person and we have been looking for over 17 years. We have shown this to professional geologists, nuclear engineers, chemists, and many others. We mode shifted Sagan’s Baloney Detection Kit to help us find folks to talk to. Every single one has said that they can not break this. A few have said nobody else will be able to either. So we are not doing this in a vacuum.  SolREI has placed this material into the largest possible peer review pool; all of civilization. We have tried for well over a decade to break it or find fault with the general concepts and every attempt has only served to make it stronger. Engage and understand what is here and why. If you can find fault with it please let us know. If you can not then please help us by beginning systems reviews of your own. The associated IP licenses only take affect (by our design and choice) only when leveraged in any revenue generating capacity. Consequently we only make money when others make money. Learning costs nothing. The patent searches conducted prior to our filing 7 May 2019 demonstrated our unique asset. The USPTO published Elegant Reasonism 26 Nov 2020 and our Press Release is entitled: Unification Accomplished. All of the appropriate predicate language is in that press release. Beyond those events we contend that over time as more and more people capable of independent thinking engage the material that they will find it just as compelling. The body of work which our network presence reflects is extensive and took over 17 years to compile and process. It is our intention to integrate all of that material for release at the appropriate time and circumstance.  Elegant Reasonism was the product of a business oriented systems review being conducted for proprietary purposes. We can share that we were looking into impact dynamics across the Sol System.

Q: Why is Elegant Reasonism so difficult to communicate?
A: Communications requires a common foundation between all parties. Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs) establish foundational context and that context changes EIM to EIM. That’s one reason for example scientists switch between M0 thinking and M1 thinking. Past successes make talking to others difficult because they do not yet perceive the problems and challenges inherant in their thinking. The status quo surroundings are familial to them. Humans generally do not like change. There are a raft of other issues as well: Not invented here, birds of a feather are flocking somewhere else, a lack of systems thinking. Lastly and probably the single greatest obfuscation element is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors or LEEs. Many simply believe they are working directly with reality rather than abstractions of it. Those people do not understand the issues. Those folks are inside a logic trap and fail to grasp how to exit the trap. That in part is one reason we built this website, to help people comprehend the logic trap. At the end of the proverbial day we can talk about all of this until we are blue in the face. We can only show you the door, you have to be willing to walk through it. If your mind is not open and accepting of scientific principles then there is nothing we can do for you. Your mind is made up. Only you can change or affect your personal paradigms to any effect. Many people accomplish personal paradigm shifts by talking to others. To that end we have placed material on this website so that you can share backlinks between your friends and colleagues exactly for that purpose. In Unification’s Wake, Part 03: Communications discusses many of these issues and more. Talk, discuss, debate, learn, adapt in order to perceive and engage the unified Universe. Our experience is that the moment your proverbial lightbulb turns on and you comprehend how all this fits together will be a tacit and palpable moment in your life. It is a moment you may never forget.

• Educators and teachers looking for ways to facilitate learning in others may find useful props in our Educator’s Shop. Items there were created for exactly that purpose.

Q: What makes Elegant Reasonism so compelling?
A: Sitting here in hindsight there are too many reasons to list. For us, just how tacit and palpable the many insight moments have been over the last 17 or so years. That it mode shifts concept sieves EMCS01 and EMCS02. That it reconciles so many other open questions many consider mysterious is another, but those are M5 FAQs and answers. Here we are discussing the process used to deliver those answers. The memes presented on some of the products above is another answer. Every individual’s answer to this will be slightly different. Business leaders are strongly encouraged and warned about many of the implications In Unification’s Wake, Part 05: Business Impact, and a video presentation of those charts is on SolREI Studios channel online. Subscribe and click that notification bell please. It helps you stay in the loop and helps us with the algorithm those folks put in the way.

 

Shop Now!

 

#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #EIM #M5 #M6 #Philosophy #Axiology #Epistemology #Ontology #Supervienence #Science #ModeShifting #TranslationMatrices #PDCF