Science

The Philosophy of Nature (e.g. Science)

There is a somewhat modern push to distinguish science distinct from philosophy and we contend and argue that is a both a mistake and constitutes Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs). The emotional relationship between science and the epistemology of empiricism has produced great success, but it has also placed “at scale” shackles on civilization not intuitively obvious because of human physiology.  This is something Susanne K Langer spent a great deal of time discussing in the body of her work. Considering science distinct from philosophy obfuscates critical thinking required to prioritize predicate priority considerations necessary to perceive unification criteria.

The Scientific Universe
The Scientific Universe

Subtending science as a specialized branch of philosophy employing unique methods and processes which seek to exploit shared experiences and common understanding of nature can we begin to reconcile issues pertaining to unification. Persisting in the belief that science is distinct from philosophy we argue constitutes commission of LEEs.

Philosophical Science of Elegant Reasonism

Elegant Reasonism, as an epistemology, is supported by the utility process employing the framework which produced The Emergence Model which is the first fully compliant model closing to unification. Having said this implies that Elegant Reasonism intrinsically recognizes the philosophical relationships (see Supervenience) these areas of study represent with respect to one another and that includes science being a specialized branch of philosophy.

The Emergence Model

Philosophically The Emergence Model is fully compliant and closes to unification across the entire entanglement gradient as a predicate priority consideration. Looking at the cogent description then of either M5 or M6, taken holistically then are The Emergence Model, we find that the smallest scale is the Most Basic Particle or MBP. While it might be easy to say that the largest scale is “the Universe”, that might be something of an illusion created by the extent of the objects representing what we consider to be that construct. The distinction being sought here is akin to considering objects in an Event Frame being called “The Event Frame”. Critical Thinking relative to Proposition 0025 tells us we need to focus on the object in the frame rather than the medium of the frame. When we take this approach what winds up being at the top of this scale are the most supermassive Black Holes and not “the Universe”. Presuming The Emergence Model’s Bang to Bang view accurately reflects what is across the entire entanglement gradient and does so to industry accepted standards, then we must presume that “all that is” is considerably larger than our particle horizon. Consequently what constitutes ‘our Universe’ is markedly different than “The Universe”, but even in that revelation holistically the entire complex composite construct is unified under The Emergence Model. The single philosophically known unknown under that model, from a decidedly scientific point of view, is where the MBPs came from and that gets down to Thought Experiment 0004 which is the proverbial something vs nothing argument.

Unification The Predicate Priority Consideration

Imaging that you are in a round room and are tasked with finding a penny in the corner of the room and the term corner is defined as the part of the edge between the floor and the wall which is not in front of you. You can follow that line until you are blue in the face and if neither the floor nor wall ever changes you will never know you were trapped. Such is a logic trap that is a contrivance made manifest by the core constructs defining it. The rhetorical question being asked here is ‘if you are that person seeking that penny, what must you do in order to exit the room?’

It has been said that the most useful statement in science is: “I do not know”, because it is situationally aware of circumstances and presents an opportunity to ask better questions. When we look at the criteria for unification such as geometric basis points, and an ability to fully couple reference frames, we find ourselves cascading down root cause analysis about why those capabilities can not be reconciled in our thinking. Ultimately one runs into ones own thinking about such subjects and then we must honestly ask which paradigms must be shifted in order to recognize the real situation. If we are honest with ourselves we must do this as objectively as possible. If someone asked “Does your thinking about this subject close to unification and you answer ‘no’, you are setting yourself up having to answer ‘Why not?’ questions. We can cite empiricism based data and experiments all day long, but we must also recognize how empiricism is fundamentally defined. What common threads does it share with other epistemologies? The answer ultimately you will come to answering that is: human physiology, and that answer leads us [ultimately] to Susanne K Langer’s body of work; which we then must immerse within the context of the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK).

 

 

Shop Now

 

#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Philosophy #Axiology #Epistemology #Ontology #Empiricism #Science #ScientificMethod #ScientificEpistemology #Experiment #EIM #Interpretation

#Evidence #Data #Information #Knowledge #KnowledgeManagement #KM