Elegant Reasonism and The Brain

Repeating for the sake of clarity Elegant Reasonism was the means by which The Emergence Model was made manifest and that point is salient here because in discussions of the brain we must segregate its physicality, processes, and how emergence instantiates it from the entanglement gradient. For reasons beyond the scope here we will constrain our focus to The Emergence Model ‘s logical view: M5 so please make sure to read and reread M5’s cogent description to maintain context integrity in your critical situational awareness thinking as you read the remainder of this page. Given that we humans already exist [e.g. in an entangled state along that gradient] it may be difficult for some to objectify this discussion in order to set the convergence vector of the entanglement gradient aside for a moment. Right now know that The Emergence Model is the Encapsulated Interpretative Model (EIM) which enables compliant discussions about organic systems emerging from inorganic systems, specifically due to the discontinuous architectures (e.g. geometric maps) allowed by Knot Theory. If individual Most Basic Particles (MBPs) are taken as a system, then we must also infer that everything real is a system of systems and we may therefore leverage the information sciences domain of discourse for the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK). Deep background is available from the original systems review notes. Once we have the essentials for instantiation we need to understand the basics of how the Central Nervous System (CNS) functions and there again we must segregate physicality, processes and the instantiation gradient vectors of emergence and convergence. Cognition of these fundamental precepts then enables a mode shifted, in context, discussion about the brain, most especially the human brain. There is also a psychological component to these discussions as well and the brain is the epicenter of those concepts in context of Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (NNRP).

The similarities which may be drawn between Plato’s allegory of The Cave from Book 7 of The Republic, written thousands of years ago and the challenges communicating the implications here are not lost on anyone familiar with In Unification’s Wake, Part 03: Communications. Understanding the mode shifted brain in fully compliant holistic context of Elegant Reasonism is considered a very advanced topic and well beyond this simple overview and outline.

P1.0: Recognition

Insights Required for Recognition

  1. Initial cognition of Elegant Reasonism and The Emergence Model accomplishing unification because that recognition enables subsequent vital discourse.
    1. Information Sciences
      1. Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBoK)
      2. Ability to conversationally distinguish data, information, knowledge in all systems and natural systems from AI systems and vice versa
      3. Cognizance that the mode shifted basis of information in all systems is a function of its architectural operations.
    2. Implications of Encapsulated Interpretative Model (EIM) relative to probem identification, challenge articulation, alternative interpretations, decision framework, and subsequent actions plans and owners for those activities.
  2. Basic synaptic enablement in the fully compliant context of Elegant Reasonism.
    1. Neural Plasticity
    2. Consolidation
    3. Memory Systems
      1. Brodmann Areas
      2. Non-cranial memory systems
    4. Neural Cell Types and their chemical operations in context of the elements
      1. Sodium Channels
      2. Potassium Channels
    5. Action Potentials
  3. Broader implications and requirements which unification brings that would otherwise not be recognized.
    1. Many of these issues are not illuminated until we begin traversing the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart.
    2. Relationships between Electric, Magnetic, merged electromagnetism (e.g. unified), in a mode shifted biological sciences systems setting to include the elements.
    3. Electromagnetic spectrum, including radio frequencies, antenna configuration, and instantiation processes
  4. Central Nervous System (CNS)
  5. Brodmann Areas of the Brain
  6. Basic astrophysics and psychology associated with signals and information
    1. The Particle Horizon
    2. The Emergence Model, especially M5, implications In Unification’s Wake’s, Part 03: Communications which requires architectures of mass to exist in order for signals to exist
      1. No architecture –> no information –> no signals of any kind

 Abstraction Inventory

The comprehensive set of abstractions needed here are beyond the scope of available space or resources to articulate at the moment. We continue to explore options within our capabilities and resources to deliver. The company generally calls for an international group to establish baseline abstraction constructs across all domains of discourse which conform to international standards and Elegant Reasonism based Six Sigma objectives.

Historical Constructs by EIM

All EIMs employing the spacetime construct (e.g. M1, M2, & M3) are fundamentally logical in nature supported by a different physical view instantiating them (e.g. M6 via M4).

      1. Nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy.
      2. A historical interpretive review of the abstractions involved and their various implications suggest commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs).
      3. Systems Engineering precepts, practices, processes and the SEBoK (linked below) demonstrate requirements and data gathering techniques under conditions where some set of circumstances create situations that may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

Major Domains of Discourse by EIM

Domains of Discourse include but are not limited to:

    1. Elegant Reasonism
      1. Encapsulated Interpretive Models (EIMs): M1, M2, M4, M5, M6
        1. Core constructs and their original manifestation/creation contexts
      2. Emergence Model
        1. M5 Cogent Description
        2. Most Basic Particles (MBPs)
        3. Entanglement Gradient
      3. Process & Methods
        1. Phase 1: Recognition
          1. ISO 9001 Unification Tool
        2. Phase 2: Illumination
          1. Translation Matrices
            1. with particular emphasis on Bayesian Analytics
        3. Phase 3: Analysis
          1. P3.9: Developing a Treatise
        4. Treatise
        5. Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart
      4. Standards
      5. The Path to Epistemology
    2. Nervous System
      1. Central Nervous System (CNS)
      2. The Brain
        1. Brodmann Areas
      3. Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (NNRP)
    3. Neural Networks

Historical Experiments

SolREI’s Original Systems Review


Reference Materials

All of the reference materials below are augmented by the User Library on this system. The acknowledgements page also serves direct links to biographical folders in that library. Also linked and integrated are pages for:

Original Systems Review Notes

ORCID References will include the same as those listed below. WorldCat will also include these manuscripts.

Network Resources

This website acts as a hub for Elegant Reasonism, resources and materials which can be used to facilitate the effectiveness of any given investigation, deployment or education activity in the herein context. SolREI Studios is also collecting playlists which readers here may find useful.

Historical References

Students and investigators should note that it is not fair to judge any of these historical or any of the the User LIbrary reference materials by modern information sciences standards. That would constitute ‘moving the goal post’ and is generally prohibited by Elegant Reasonism. The idea here is to present the thinking, at the time, by that original author. Where this specifically comes into affect is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs); which to make this point salient was first quantified by Susanne K Langer in 1948 and codified by SolREI INC. Another facet of unraveling historical points of view relative to requirements of unification are both logical and physical views in context both Systems Engineering and of LEEs. Subsequent to this contextual update in our thinking we are then required to employ critical situational awareness thinking that something may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

P2.0: Illumination

Neural plasticity across typical lifespans then scaled up across civilization throughout Sol_03-Earth‘s history likely plays out across the unified Universe to the furthest reaches depicted in any deep space image. Critical review will not discount the more profound implications of implementing heuristics and metacognitive analysis relative to and respective of deployment considerations. Leadership instigating any given investigation should also not loose sight of data criteria associated with Bayesian Analytics and the opportunity they represent for development of education road maps relative to the larger deployment considerations across any given enterprise and its associated value chain.

  • Segregating domains of discourse and detail sets as a function of P1.0 insight 6.2.1. here above out across traditional epistemologies and currenly recognized EIMs.
  • Integrity assurance relative to critically situationally aware thinking across the investigative team
  • Enabling Mode Shifting
    • Translation Matrices
    • Success Metrics

Supporting Concepts

Supporting Propositions

The proposition here is supported by, but not limited to, those propositions listed below:

  • To Be Integrated Here

Supporting Thought Experiments

  • To Be Integrated Here

Illumination FAQs

This section should link to the FAQs page for this particular concept or proposition page and should detail the most common questions about it. The idea being that someone might want to simply read those Q&As rather than wade through the detail here and putting those on their own page allows this page to be more concise.

P3.0: Analysis

The User Library and extended research will likely be very helpful in your analysis of this area of philosophical comprehension.

The importance of Knowledge Management of this information relative to any given investigation can not be emphasized too greatly. While the taxonomic relationships generally follows the form below what should not be lost on anyone here is that all of this must be in a mode shifted context:

Consequently it is important to know what and who to believe and for that reason we mode shifted the baloney detection kit.

P3.9 Development of Final Treatise

The idea behind this section is illuminating insights that do not become visible until effective mode shifting has been enabled and ‘clean’ navigation of the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart has been achieved/accomplished.


The human brain is a marvel of the unified Universe. When we set our conceit aside and recognize the natural flow resulting from the intrinsic nature of MBPs to not only form life but sentient life we come away with a distinctly more powerful perspective on Hubble Ultra Deep Field images than we ever had. It is statistically so improbable that sentient life is unique to Sol_03-Earth as to completely dismiss that arcane relic from long ago campfires. When we realize deep implications of the M5 cogent description from a cosmological perspective we are then able to reconcile the Drake Equation with the Fermi Paradox. Life is everywhere, but interstellar travel is exceptionally difficult. The Kepler mission is only now beginning to identify other systems and on that growing list is a much smaller but also growing list of systems that seem to be building Dyson Spheres and that is exactly what we would expect to find.

What we find astounding in all of this is that the Brodmann areas of the human brain are intrinsically wired to improve contextual action through NNRP. You can not learn about Elegant Reasonism and how to wield it transformationally without it reconfiguring your neural networks. When that happens your conversational dynamics improves to the point that it establishes a natural Kaizen cascade. The better you are, the better youi will comprehend in dynamic conversations and discourse. That insight is vital to understand across global enterprise and economy, most especially In Unification’s Wake, Part 05: Business Impact. Leadership should recognize that both individuals and entire enterprises may, likely will, transition through standard stages of grief coping with paradigm shifts associated wtih mode shifting vested knowledge into alignment the the unified Universe and we can not stress enough to deal with such activities with compassion and empathy. Remember that it is the individual responsible for their own paradigm shifts. All we can do is provide the materials and fodder for discussion. In essence, we can show you the door: but you must walk through it. Choice and free will are in full play in all of this.


Shop Now!

Wherever possible merchandise products specific to the topic being presented should be those linked or identified in the product shopping area.



#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #Philosophy #Science #Biology #CNS #Brain #BrodmannArea