EMCS03

Emergence Model Concept Sieve 03: Thermodynamics

This concept sieve was not part of the original systems review per se. We are working to develop it as a specific tool for other investigators to push beyond our original work. Many of the individual concepts were part of the original systems review (e.g. EMCS01) but others are not. The latter concepts not originally included will be enumerated beyond the original set which generally concluding their enumeration around 403. We have made an attempt to include key contributors original works in the User Library for reference purposes. New investigators should make sure they are familiar with the Press Release materials, and other available resources.

Process & Methods

The process and methods associated with enabling mode shifting under Elegant Reasonism and its rules work to eliminate Langer Epistemology Errors in characterization, discussion, and insight development. Terms like illumination and illustration are elevated in meaning relative to and respective of any ability to even fathom some insights available in no other manner. It is the juxtaposition of the plurality of EIMs which enables such comparisons and given the requirement that at least one of those EIMs close to unification completely changes the tone and manner of the content of those investigative discussions. EMCS03 is a concept sieve. What that means is that 100% of the associated concepts must mode shift relative to the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart. One may think of that as a simultaneous context switch EIM to EIM. Such capability is powerful. Investigators choosing to employ M4 in such efforts may find that useful in terms of parameter segregation or parsing.

P1.0 Recognition

Insights Required for Recogntion

Insights may be from any area from the body of work conducted to date documented and defined across and & all EIMs. Specific abstraction terms should be documented within the ISO 9001 Unification Tool. Images and video materials may also be used. Steps should be taken when links out to external resources are used that those materials are not interfered with. Material employed should be in the public domain or comply with applicable and appropriate law.

Abstraction Inventory

The list of abstractions under review for inclusion here are essentially those listed as nomenclature in many of the texts available in the User Library under Thermodynamics in the documents folder there.

  1. Area
  2. Base of Natural Logarithms
  3. Bore ; Diameter
  4. Emissive Power ; Total Energy
  5. Enthalpy
  6. Gravitational Acceleration
  7. Latent Heat
  8. Mass
  9. Molar Heat
  10. Molecular Weight
  11. Mass (See:
    1. Concept-0289: Mass
    2. Dr. Lev B Okun & The Concept of Mass)
  12. Specific Heat (See EMCS02 Property-0056: Specific Heat)
  13. Steady-Flow Availability Function
  14. Temperature (on various scales) (See EMCS02 Property-0058: Temperature)
  15. Thermal Conductivity ; Blade Velocity Coefficient (See EMCS02 Property-0060: Thermal Conductivity)
  16. Velocity

Historical Constructs by EIM

EMCS03 is about Thermodynamics and while it may not seem appropriate to discuss EIM constructs here; the reason we are is that depending on which EIM is under focus for a given discussion will change the detail set of objects considered real which may or may not influence thermodynamic considerations. For example, gravity under M1 is considered a phenomena resulting from mass warping space. The LIGO experiments were setup to detect gravity waves propagating through spacetime. Under M1 or M2 we must consider thermodynamics of spacetime in how that experiment is characterized. Mode shifting that same experiment from M1 or M2 relative to and respective of M5 finds a different definition for space, which can propagate nothing in and of itself. Under M5 gravity is made manifest by the action of configurations manifesting a particle called the Graviton. Under M5 what LIGO is detecting are waves of those particles influencing their detectors. So, while the resulting conclusions may be the same or similar, what changes is why those results are true. The former characterization does not close to unification while the latter does close. Thermodynamics therefore under M1 or M2 scenarios are discussions about how spacetime must be made to transfer that thermodynamic energy and we are reminded here that nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy. That fact precludes the use of a common geometric basis point in those discussions or characterizations. Thermodynamics therefore under M5 result from the intrinsic action of Graviton fields within an Event Frame and we may set the boundaries of that reference frame to include both source, target and experimental instruments all using a common geometric basis point for all real objects. The tone and manner of Thermodynamic M5 discussions are dramatically different than are the same discussions under M1 or M2; which is the point here relative to and respective of historical constructs by EIM.

Taking the above paragraph holistically in fully compiant context of Elegant Reasonism then takes Thermodynamics into areas heretofore never explored. Bell Inequality tests suggesting superluminal action, Hubble Red & Blue Shifts, mode shifting z-factors, Graviton pole-reversal, Graviton polar actions, and specific Architectures of Mass relative to and respective of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance across the entire entanglement gradient are just a very few examples. Another which should be of great interest to global enterprise and pointed out In Unification's Wake, Part 05: Business Impact are investigations to determine whether or not their business plans are dependent on Red Herrings or not. Thermodynamics will play vital roles in such investigations.

All EIMs employing the spacetime construct (e.g. M1, M2, & M3) are fundamentally logical in nature supported by a different physical view instantiating them (e.g. M6 via M4).

    1. Nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy.
    2. A historical interpretive review of the abstractions involved and their various implications suggest commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs).
    3. Systems Engineering precepts, practices, processes and the SEBoK (linked below) demonstrate requirements and data gathering techniques under conditions where some set of circumstances create situations that may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

 

Reference Materials

All of the reference materials below are augmented by the User Library on this system. The acknowledgements page also serves direct links to biographical folders in that library. Also linked and integrated are pages for each of the laws established for thermodynamics:

Historical Investigators

The list below is in alphabetical order. It should be noted that the section title here is linked to the full list of acknowledgements on whose body of work Elegant Reasonism was originally inspired. The people listed below significantly contributed to the field of Thermodynamics. It is important to note too that our work effort spanned almost 20 years and during that time we have suffered many computer crashes and lost considerable materials originally in our possession. We have tried to recreate the original body of that material as faithfully as possible, but we may have made mistakes and we mean no disrespect or intended omission of any type. If you see something patently out of place in the holistic context of Elegant Reasonism please do not hesitate to contact us.

The abstraction inventory for the holistic treatise on thermodynamics is extensive. The original systems review did not fully investigate every facet, rather we engaged major concepts and vetted them in terms of the requirements for unification. Elegant Reasonism cleared every concept checked. We invite and encourage others to verify, validate, and vette any and all concepts.

Historical Review & Approach

Any discussion of the manifestation of real objects must necessarily mention the historical perceptions on the medium around those objects.

Students and investigators should note that it is not fair to judge any of these historical references by modern information sciences standards. That would constitute 'moving the goal post' and is generally prohibited by Elegant Reasonism. The idea here is to present the thinking, at the time, by that original author. Where this specifically comes into affect is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs); which to make this point salient was first quantified by Susanne K Langer in 1948 and codified by SolREI INC. Another facet of unraveling historical points of view relative to requirements of unification are both logical and physical views in context both Systems Engineering and of LEEs. Subsequent to this contextual update in our thinking we are then required to employ critical situational awareness thinking that something may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

"We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them.", ~ Albert Einstein

P2.0 illumination

Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics

First Law of Thermodynamics

Second Law of Thermodynamics

Third Law of Thermodynamics

  • Chemical Thermodynamics
  • Classical Thermodynamics
  • Conjugate Variables
    • Chemical Potential-Particle Number
    • Pressure-Volume
    • Temperature-Entropy
  • Equilibrium Thermodynamics
  • Instrumentation
  • Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics
  • Potentials
    • Enthalpy
    • Gibbs Free Energy
    • Internal Energy
    • Helmholtz Free Energy
    • Landau Potential or Grand Potential
  • States and Processes
    • Adiabatic Process: occurs without loss or gain of energy by heat
    • Isenthalpic Processes: occurs at a constant enthalpy
    • Isentropic Processes: a reversible Adiabatic Process
    • Isobaric Processes: occurs at a constant pressure
    • Isochoric Processes: occurs at a constant volume
    • Isothermal Processes: occurs at a constant temperature
    • Steady State Processes: transpires without a change in internal energy
  • Statistical Mechanics
  • Systems Models

 

P3.0 Analysis

See Individual Landing Pages TBD

P3.9 Developing Treatise

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Elementum integer enim neque volutpat ac tincidunt vitae semper quis. Elementum nibh tellus molestie nunc non. Placerat duis ultricies lacus sed turpis tincidunt id aliquet. Ultrices vitae auctor eu augue ut. Sed euismod nisi porta lorem. Ut eu sem integer vitae justo. Mi proin sed libero enim sed faucibus. Integer malesuada nunc vel risus commodo. Quam id leo in vitae turpis massa sed elementum tempus. Pulvinar proin gravida hendrerit lectus a. Et magnis dis parturient montes. Hendrerit gravida rutrum quisque non. In metus vulputate eu scelerisque felis imperdiet proin fermentum. Sed nisi lacus sed viverra tellus in hac habitasse platea.

Nulla aliquet enim tortor at. At quis risus sed vulputate odio. Erat imperdiet sed euismod nisi porta lorem. Volutpat lacus laoreet non curabitur gravida arcu. In hac habitasse platea dictumst vestibulum. Viverra maecenas accumsan lacus vel facilisis. Facilisi cras fermentum odio eu feugiat. Sed egestas egestas fringilla phasellus faucibus scelerisque eleifend donec pretium. Viverra maecenas accumsan lacus vel. Fringilla ut morbi tincidunt augue. Diam in arcu cursus euismod quis viverra. Scelerisque fermentum dui faucibus in ornare quam viverra orci sagittis. Sed lectus vestibulum mattis ullamcorper velit sed ullamcorper. Fermentum leo vel orci porta non pulvinar neque. In hac habitasse platea dictumst vestibulum rhoncus est pellentesque elit. Ac placerat vestibulum lectus mauris ultrices eros. Lorem sed risus ultricies tristique nulla aliquet enim. Dignissim sodales ut eu sem integer vitae justo.

Treatise

Thermodynamics under The Emergence Model is more natural, makes more common sense, is simpler, and is elegantly tied to the intrinsic nature of the basis core constructs. Furthermore, thermodynamic behavior is consistent with the fundamental processes derived from those foundational constructs intrinsic nature. When we reflect on characterizations such configurations interacting within an Event Frame the entire entanglement gradient is likely simultaneously in action for most configurations where all orders of complexity operate as a function of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance. Thermodynamic action across the entanglement gradient is simply fascinating to contemplate and the precipice gained through The Emergence Model in fully compliant context of Elegant Reasonism enables discussions which could not be held in any other forum. When we enable and empower EMCS03 such discussions become even more powerful as do resulting insights. When we consider that EMCS01, EMCS02, and EMCS03 all simultaneously mode shift, the only word that comes to mind characterizing such eventuality is gobsmacked. Awestruck doesn't seem to carry enough momentum or mass to convey the power Elegant Reasonism delivers.

Shop Now!

 

#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #EIM #Unification #M1 #M2 #M4 #M5 #M6 #ConceptSieve #EMCS03

%d bloggers like this: