Magnetic Moment

Magnetic Moment

The magnetic moment is the magnetic strength and orientation of a magnet or other object that produces a magnetic field. Intrinsically the concept behind this physical property is a manifestation of the architectures of mass producing the phenomena, most especially within the electron. the term magnetic moment normally refers to a system’s magnetic dipole moment, the component of the magnetic moment that can be represented by an equivalent magnetic dipole: a magnetic north and south pole separated by a very small distance. The magnetic dipole component is sufficient for small enough magnets or for large enough distances. Higher-order terms (such as the magnetic quadrupole moment) may be needed in addition to the dipole moment for extended objects. The magnetic dipole moment of an object is readily defined in terms of the torque that the object experiences in a given magnetic field. The same applied magnetic field creates larger torques on objects with larger magnetic moments. The strength (and direction) of this torque depends not only on the magnitude of the magnetic moment but also on its orientation relative to the direction of the magnetic field. The magnetic moment may be considered, therefore, to be a vector. The direction of the magnetic moment points from the south to north pole of the magnet (inside the magnet). The magnetic field of a magnetic dipole is proportional to its magnetic dipole moment. The dipole component of an object’s magnetic field is symmetric about the direction of its magnetic dipole moment, and decreases as the inverse cube of the distance from the object.

Mode Shifting Magnetic Moment

Any investigation into enabling mode shifting magnetic moment will have to execute the utility process, enabling the framework in order to support the epistemology. That generally means execution of the three primary phase steps (below) in order to develop any fully compliant treatise with affinity to the unified Universe. Mode shifting this physical property is a bit more involved than one might first expect because of the systemic pattern relationships involved and the relative plurality of Encapsulated Interpretative Models (EIMs) where each Paradigm of Interest/Nature (POI/N) must be made manifest. These patterns must navigate the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart across the entire entanglement gradient in both the emergent and convergent vectors.

We will briefly discuss issues from the EIMs: M1, M2, M4, and M5. What is articulated here is not a full treatment of the subject rather enough fodder for others to begin their quests to undersand both Elegant Reasonism and The Emergence Model. Because the magnetic moment concerns orientation of the magnetic field and what is instantiating it the distinctions between M1 and M2 are important from an investigative point of view due to the externalization of parameters relative to mass under M2 that are considered intrinsic under M1. Instantiation if these core constructs is the primary concern across all EIMs.

Scanning the core constructs of the pluralistic EIM set employed here do intrinsic distinctions become evident relative to this particular investigation. For example, concepts like convergence which require elaborate explanations under M1 are rendered so obvious as to be rendered elegant by the cogent description of M5. Mode shifting the general environment finds a still important area of understanding completely absent: the specific configuration of architectural mass that manifests any given property as well as all the standard mode shifted answers to root cause analysis. This is a major area of interest, but beyond the scope here. Consequently we will simply refer to im as ‘architectures of mass’ where is the symbol for complex numbers. Readers need to remember that the term ‘c’ mode shifts from the speed of light under M1 and M2 to mean Severance under M5. The velocity number is the same but the reasons it is true are completely different.

P1.0: Recognition

Insights Required for Recogntion

Ivestigators insights may be from any area from the body of work conducted to date, documented, and defined across all EIMs to the extent possible. Specific abstraction terms should be documented within the ISO 9001 Unification Tool or its equivalent. Images and video materials may also be used. Steps should be taken when links out to external resources are used that those materials are not interfered with. Material employed should be in the public domain or comply with applicable and appropriate natural law.

Even though atomic particles cannot be accurately described as orbiting (and spinning) charge distributions of uniform charge-to-mass ratio, this general trend can be observed in the atomic world so that the M1 formula mode shifts to:


m=ge2 imL


Note: technical issues are preventing proper formatting of the equation on some devices.


where m is the magnetic moment, e is the charge of the particle and the complex number represents the architectural mass. The  g-factor depends on the particle and configuration. This formula follows the Generalized Mathematical Form Describing Relationships and where L is the angular momentum of the particle or particles that are creating the magnetic moment. For example the g-factor for the magnetic moment due to an electron orbiting a nucleus is one while the g-factor for the magnetic moment of electron due to its intrinsic angular momentum (spin) is a little larger than 2. The g-factor of atoms and molecules must account for the orbital and intrinsic moments of its electrons and possibly the intrinsic moment of its nuclei as well. In the atomic world the angular momentum (spin) of a particle is an integer (or half-integer in the case of spin) multiple of the Reduced Planck’s Constant ħ. This is the basis for defining the magnetic moment units of Bohr magneton (assuming charge-to-mass ratio of the electron) and nuclear magneton (assuming charge-to-mass ratio of the proton).

What is not obvious in this formula are the intricacies associated with architectural dynamics and in all likelihood this formula is only the most crude example. Explorations need to be conducted into the architectures associated with every mass not just these. It must be recognized that these are complex composite discontinuous geometric maps manifesting dynamic architectures. That while the constituents of those composites all follow the same source of intrinsic nature, their individual architectural structures may increase strength, change stress or tension associated with them. There is a great deal of R&D which needs to be done here but the impact that research would have for civilization is quite profound.

These issues are at the heart of all chemical bonds both elemental and molecular. These issues exemplify investigations into all subatomic particles and their higher ordered relationships. Under M5 we observe the cogent description of M5 but we must enable effective mode shifting across the entire entanglement gradient for any given investigation to assure the integrity of the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart. These decisions, insights, will no doubt be inspiring across pharmacology, nuclear remediation, risk management, and sciences in general. We have a great deal more R&D to accomplish indeed.

These are not just learning point insights juxtaposing the traditionally viewed formula versus one in alignment with The Emergence Model. The distinctions may superficially appear that but the deeper more profound implications are illuminated to illustration when we fully enable mode shifting through the utility process, framework, and epistemology. Unless one comprehends the approach that produces the insights those same insights will lack the common communications framework necessary in order to justify their existence to others. Conversely if you do not understand the need for such changes then you also need to fully comprehend Elegant Reasonism and the reasons why it is needed.

Abstraction Inventory

The abstraction inventory below provides foundation concepts for Paradigm of Interest/Nature (POI/N) for investigations.

    1. Action
    2. Architecture
    3. Arm
    4. Basis
    5. Bond (Chemical)
    6. Character
    7. Construct
    8. Converge / Convergence
    9. Dimension(s)
    10. Distance
    11. Electric
    12. Electromagnetism
    13. Electron
    14. Energy
    15. Entanglement
      1. The Fundamental Entanglement Function
      2. Entanglement Gradient
    16. Epistemology
      1. Constructivism
      2. Elegant Reasonism
      3. Empiricism
        1. LEEs Empiricism Trap
      4. Rationalism
      5. Scientific Epistemology (e.g. Empiricism)
    17. Force
    18. Frame of Reference
    19. Frequency
    20. Geometry
      1. Discontinuity / Discontinuous
      2. Geometric Map
      3. Topology
    21. Gravity
    22. Instantiate
    23. Interface
    24. Langer Epistemology Errors
    25. Light
    26. Logic / Logical
    27. Magnetism
    28. Mass
    29. Mathematics
      1. Constant
      2. Equation / Formula
      3. Parameter
      4. Variable
    30. Moment
    31. Nature
    32. Object
    33. “Of”
    34. Phenomena
    35. Philosophy / Philosophical
      1. Axiology: philosophy of value derivation
      2. Epistemology: philosophy of knowledge
      3. Ontology: philosophy of being
      4. Science: philosophy of nature
      5. Supervenience – philosophy of order
    36. Photon
    37. Power
    38. Property
    39. Real & Reality
    40. Relation / Relations / Relationship
    41. Science
    42. Severance
    43. Space
    44. Speed
    45. Stress
    46. Symbol / Symbolism
    47. Tension
    48. Time
    49. Vector
    50. Velocity
    51. Warp
    52. Work

Historical Constructs by EIM

All EIMs employing the spacetime construct (e.g. M1, M2, & M3) are fundamentally logical in nature supported by a different physical view instantiating them (e.g. M6 via M4).

  1. Under M1, M2, or M3: Nothing real may transit the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy. Also see Dr. Lev B Okun discussion on The Concept of Mass.
  2. A historical interpretive review of the abstractions involved and their various implications suggest commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs).
  3. Systems Engineering precepts, practices, processes and the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SEBok) demonstrate requirements and data gathering techniques under conditions where some set of circumstances create situations that may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

Major Domains of Discourse by EIM

Domains of Discourse include but are not limited to:

    1. EIMs: M1, M2, M4, M5, M6
      1. Core constructs and their original manifestation/creation contexts
    2. Science of Mathematics
      1. Euler’s Concepts Relative to String Theory, Convergence, Polar Residue Emergence as a Phenomena
        1. Beta Function (EMCS01: Concept – 0023)
        2. Gamma Function (EMCS01: Concept – 0024)
      2.  Geometry
        1. Basis Points
        2. Topology
          1. Basis
          2. Geometric Maps
          3. Knot Theory
    3. Astrophysics
      1. Reference Frames
        1. M1, M2 – Inertial Frames and their geometric basis
        2. M5Event Frames and Local Frames
      2. Spacetime (systems review)
    4. Physics
      1. General & Special Relativity
      2. Recognition that under the cogent description of M5 Gravitons are polarized by High Mass-Low Mass interaction areas in full holistic context of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance.

Historical Experiments

  1. Logically correct,
  2. May be mode shifted into alignment with M5 consistent with Elegant Reasonism processes & methods,
  3. Mode Shifting the traditional view of the Big Bang, along with the WMAP project as well as its data, re-positions the Lambda CDM model in context of The Emergence Model dismantles the Inflationary Theory and yields The Emergence Model‘s Bang to Bang perspective.

SolREI’s Original Systems Review

  1. Mode Shifts the constant ‘c’:
    1. Under M1 is defined as ‘the speed of light
    2. Under M5 is defined as ‘the velocity of a photon produced by a system in an Event Frame predominantly described under EFPS1 exceeding the threshold of Severance and releasing a photon due to centripetal force in the interacting system.’
      1. Cosmologically this results in Spectroscopic Red & Blue Shifts reporting actual Geodesic Photon Rapidity (e.g. Concept 168) under EMCS01.
    3. Mode Shifting ‘c’ in this manner fundamentally disintermediates conceiving spacetime as a physical construct and further substantiates M1 commission of LEEs.
  2. The original systems review found this proposition dovetailed with The Emergence Model reflecting the unified Universe held litmus.

Reference Materials

All of the reference materials below are augmented by the User Library on this system. The acknowledgements page also serves direct links to biographical folders in that library. Also linked and integrated are pages for:

Original Systems Review Notes

ORCID References will include the same as those listed below. WorldCat will also include these manuscripts.

Network Resources

Historical References

Students and investigators should note that it is not fair to judge any of these historical or any of the the User LIbrary reference materials by modern information sciences standards. That would constitute ‘moving the goal post’ and is generally prohibited by Elegant Reasonism. The idea here is to present the thinking, at the time, by that original author. Where this specifically comes into affect is commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs); which to make this point salient was first quantified by Susanne K Langer in 1948 and codified by SolREI INC. Another facet of unraveling historical points of view relative to requirements of unification are both logical and physical views in context both Systems Engineering and of LEEs. Subsequent to this contextual update in our thinking we are then required to employ critical situational awareness thinking that something may be logically correct yet remain physically different.

“We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them.”, ~ Albert Einstein


P2.0: Illumination

Illuminating the various EIMs and construct manifestations (e.g. instantiation for those constructs) and the philosophical nature recognized entering science we must recognize the fundamental validity of assertions being asserted. This requires us to ask and answer some very difficult questions relative to and respective of the perspectives established by each EIM within a fully compliant and valid 2D Articulation Frame in preparation of the next phase of the process & methods leveraging fully compliant Translation Matrices.

Supporting Concepts

Supporting Propositions

The proposition here is supported by, but not limited to, those propositions listed below:

Supporting Thought Experiments

Illumination FAQs

This section should link to the FAQs page for this particular concept or proposition page and should detail the most common questions about it. The idea being that someone might want to simply read those Q&As rather than wade through the detail here and putting those on their own page allows this page to be more concise.

P3.0: Analysis

The process and methods worked through the various analytical layers of Translation Matrices to produce the insights listed above in the recognition phase of the original systems review notes all lnked above..

P3.9 Development of Final Treatise

The idea behind this section is illuminating insights that do not become visible until effective mode shifting has been enabled and ‘clean’ navigation of the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart has been achieved/accomplished.


The magnetic moment mode shifted into alignment with the unified Universe is vital for a number of reasons but its central role in elemental and molecular physics and chemistry take precedence. The broader sciences will be revolutionized by these insights, but specific areas like pharmaceuticals, nuclear remediation, and the broader chemical markets will all directly benefit.


Shop Now!

Wherever possible merchandise products specific to the topic being presented should be those linked or identified in the product shopping area.


The very last set of items on any given page should be hash-tags identifying this page to SEO Search Engines.


#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #Property-0045 #MagneticMoment



%d bloggers like this: