LVM Human ActionLudwig von Mises Human Action

Action Potentials Driving Human Action

Human Action Opening
Human Action
Human Action Book
Human Action Book

Human Action, is a treatise on economics published by Ludwig von Mises, originally in 1949. I find it incredible that such minds as Einstein, Langer, Okun, and Mises never, to this author’s knowledge, ever got together or met in any way. They were contemporaneous temporally, but culturally they were in different worlds. They would have had much to discuss and had that meeting transpired, the world would be a vastly different place today. As it is, here we are and the path forward is Elegant Reasonism. When we critically review the role action plays in the fundamental aspects of the core constructs of M5 we begin to comprehend its systemic meaning only in full cognition of the implications stemming from being able to describe the Universe Bang to Bang. Realizing that Elegant Reasonism represents a net new epistemology implies that every human endeavor necessarily may be related in this manner and that includes economics. Following along that line of reasoning ultimately brings us to Human Action as envisioned by Mises. Mises recursively makes arguments that human decisions and actions are behind economic behavior all of which are instantiated by action potentials driven through the CNS to our brains.

Unification, as a concept, is about credible manifestation of the integration of everything real no matter how restful the relationship patterns may be. We may investigate the entanglement gradient along either emergent or convergent vectors. Ultimately what matters is full compliance to Elegant Reasonism.

Evidence Chain Linking Economics

Ultimately the evidence chains establishing the essential relationships lead back to the unified Universe through human action and the CNS action potentials instantiating the epistemological path. We can anchor the various paradigms represented in Mises’ treatise to the neural patterns they represent instantiated by their relative and respective action potentials within the CNS. Those relationship patterns ultimately link these subjects back to the unified Universe. As we better understand these linkages and patterns they represent, humanity will be better able to leverage Elegant Reasonism based curricula which in turn will drive Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (e.g. education)  (NNRP) which here means aligned with the unified Universe, across all levels supporting higher education, specifically in subjects as vital as economics.


Economic CSAT

Critical Thinking Influence Factors
Critical Thinking Influence Factors

CSAT is critical situational awareness thinking which might superficially sound recognizable, but there specifically refers to the degree to which conversationally aligns with the unified Universe (e.g. has/can the discussion been mode shifted?). Do the evidence chains supporting your prime consideration have anchor points within an EIM derived context which closes to unification or perhaps something else entirely? If those anchor points are anywhere other than the unified Universe then you have work to do if you expect to support truth as a function of the unified Universe. Even if you do have solid linkage along the path to the unified Universe you still have to deal with logical system views of real constructs which likely means you’ll need systems engineering skills to sort all that out. Then as all of that is taking place you also must recognize restful relationships and patterns across the domain of discourse and its various constituent detail sets.

The central question here relative to traditional critical thinking is in terms of the specific discrimination terms, concepts, and constructs employed. Here it means relative to the source of truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science, not after you get there and that distinction matters. It matters more than anyone would have imagined exactly because commission of Langer Epistemology Errors leads directly into the teeth of LEEs Empiricism Trap. Unification as a philosophical construct requires a credible manifestation of everything real across the entire entanglement gradient and in both emergent and convergent vectors. Remember, other epistemologies may be employed but they are statistically weighted relative to and respective of their full compliance with the realm of c’s, one of which is Closure (to the unified Universe).


Mode Shifting Value

The strategic issue being addressed here is whether or not the degree to which the enterprise is or is not aware of its asset dependencies relative to and respective of the unified Universe. When von Mises wrote the above book all he really knew was the dependency on human decision. What we did was link those decisions epistemologically to truth and value as a function of the unified Universe. but that entire body of work the above book reflects needs to be mode shifted. Axiology is the philosophical study of value derivation and herein implies the same context and source of truth.




Shop Now

#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #HumanAction #Mises #Economics #ActionPotential #CNS #Brain #BA

By Charles McGowen

Charles C McGowen is a strategic business consultant. He studied Aerospace Engineering at Auburn University '76-'78. IBM hired him early in '79 where he worked until 2003. He is now Chairman & CEO of SolREI, Inc. ORCID: