Representational State Transfer

Roy Fielding’s original dissertation circa 2000.

The Emergence Model was made manifest as a function of a systems review conducted from about 2004 and culminating November 26th, 2020 when the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) released Elegant Reasonism to the world. Our white paper describes how unification was accomplished. Essentially that document outlines what was necessary in order to perceive and engage the unified Universe. We argue that The Emergence Model is ‘RESTFUL’. The Emergence Model is holistically represented by the integrated composite of M5 & M6. Together those two EIMs are symbiotic and synergistic. They are derivatives of their initial construct (e.g. the intrinsic nature of MBPs, which themselves were a product of that original systems review). Because of this design and approach we contend that The Emergence Model is restful, but beyond that emerges the point that subsequent searches for EIMs which may also be fully compliant be just as restful. That is to say subsequent EIM development has a REST architectural requirement demanded of it.

Ironically there are many aspects of Fielding’s original work which correspond to requirements of unification. In hindsight it seems apparent that we are all essentially striving for that common truth. In that context it seems that REST, as a concept, meets those requirements and demands. There are many aspects of Elegant Reasonism borrowed from information sciences and industry they support. Systems Engineering, Translation Matrices, and others contributed heavily. Interestingly the original system review did not have unification as a goal or objective. It was focused on impact dynamics in context of astrophysics. When we stubbed our toe on unification and began digging we realized with great horror what we had discovered. We knew the burden it had placed on us and quite candidly it was terrifying. However, we suited up and began the journey in spite of all advice to the contrary. Almost 20 years later, here we are.

Relationship Linkage Manifestation

The Emergence Model is intrinsically derived from Thought Experiment 0004: Something vs Nothing from which the Most Basic Particle (MBP) emerged. From that stage the intrinsic nature of all MBPs was developed. That intrinsic nature derives two inherent processes a build process and a failure mode process. Under M5 we thus have The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance. The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance configures MBPs into architectures of mass comprising everything real. Individual MBPs taken as a system based on their inherent nature implies that everything real is a system or system of systems. Consequently Systems Engineering skills are vital in requirements gathering across the entire entanglement gradient in both the emergent and convergent vectors. Because of that intrinsic nature configurations of MBPs naturally follow Knot Theory following The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance. Any critical review of Knot Theory will demonstrate the asynchronous and discontinuous nature of various knots so produced. That discontinuity is important because it enables many aspects of nature including physical properties, different types of matter (e.g. normal matter and so called dark matter), the schism between inorganic and organic matter, and a great deal more. Knots entangle with various saturation and densities associated with them. Permutations of such configurations will interact differently with other configurations across a staggering array of permutations. Essentially these are the mechanics behind every real object in the unified Universe according to The Emergence Model.

The challenge then for investigators is the inventory of 100% of abstractions they are dealing with and to then enable mode shifting through the process, to appropriate standards, for their investigation in order that they may effectively navigate the Process Decision Checkpoint Flowchart. Investigators working on formal projects would be wise to follow ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems (QMS) in order to fully document all abstractions in a tool like our ISO 9001 Unification Tool or its equivalent in order to establish credible linkage between anchor point to final constructs thus establishing credible evidence chains which represent pattern relationships EIM to EIM for any given Paradigm of Interest/Nature (POI/N). Only through the fully compliant analytics of Elegant Reasonism will such evidence chains be justified and full context be established. What is not intuitively obvious are the implications of encapsulation boundaries relative to perception of patterns in a different EIM. Those implications are why other EIMs are generally not perceivable from within any given EIM exactly because every EIM establishes fundamental interpretative context manifesting how reality is perceived. Investigators must objectify their perspective through analytical layers of Translation Matrices below the 2D Articulation Layer in order to gain that objective precipice.

Investigators should be warned here to re-read the sentence stating what Elegant Reasonism is. The reason for the warning is what happens when you believe you have simultaneous truths but can not perceive where Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) are being committed. The warning comes into its own when you realize there is no way in science to determine the answer to the questions being constructed. In the video below Richard P Feynman discusses in a 1950’s era presentation exactly this scenario when talking about knowing vs understanding.

Fast forwarding to the present moment, we now have an arsenal of new questions we can ask and new tools to leverage against these types of problems. We can now check which theory is more compliant with Elegant Reasonism (e.g. closes to unification better).  We can test those criteria agains an array of experiments (which may or may not need to be mode shifted themselves). By extrapolating the same REpresentational State Transfer (REST) from information sciences types of issues, we can link far ranging relative and respective domains of discourse and their constituent detail sets.





#ElegantReasoniism #EmergenceModel #Unification #Relationships #Patterns #REST #Evidence #EvidenceChains #Abstractions #Process #Framework #Epistemology #Requirements #SystemsEngineering