Scale re: DeVitoScales relative to Danny DeVito

Entanglement Gradient Spanning All Scales

The primary article on the Entanglement Gradient is here. That article makes the point that Encapsulated Interpretative Models (EIMs) must make manifest everything real from the smallest to the largest constructs and do so in full compliance with the realm of c’s.

Elegant Reasonism, the utility process employing a technological framework supporting an epistemology holistically seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science. That process and epistemology produced the first EIM to close to unification: The Emergence Model. One of the aspects arising from this EIM are two processes derived from the intrinsic nature of its core constituent constructs: Most Basic Particles or MBPs. The first process, the build process, is limited by the other, the failure mode process. Properly articulated we then have The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance responsible for configuring everything real across all scales. It is that scale of configuration which brings us here today. We are releasing a new page to the system discussing the new page entitled: Entanglement Gradient.

Reference Frames

Reference frames must be mode shifted EIM to EIM to maintain investigation context relative to any given set of Paradigms Of Interest/Nature (POI/N). It should be noted that reference frames are creatures of the context made manifest by the Encapsulated Interpretative Models (EIMs) instantiating them. Inertial Frames, for example work well with M1, M2, and it it existed M3, but under The Emergence Model must establish inertial relationships between real objects. It is worth noting on that comment that The Emergence Model holds mass as invariant as does M2. This places inertia factors external to mass. Also under The Emergence Model due to how space is defined the frame can not be a function of space, but rather the real objects (and their associated criteria) found within the Local or Event Frames.

Context of Reference

In classical physics and special relativity, an inertial frame of reference (also called inertial space, or Newtonian reference frame) is a frame of reference that is not undergoing any acceleration. Note: a Galilean transformation is used to transform between the coordinates of two reference frames which differ only by constant relative motion within the constructs of Newtonian physics. These transformations together with spatial rotations and translations in space and time form the in-homogeneous Galilean group. It is a frame in which an isolated physical object—an object with zero net force acting on it—is perceived to move with a constant velocity or, equivalently, it is a frame of reference in which Newton’s first law of motion holds. All inertial frames are in a state of constant, rectilinear motion with respect to one another; in other words, an accelerometer moving with any of them would detect zero acceleration.

The strategic problem with such frames is that they are not connected to the rest of reality via a common real geometric basis point. They are incapable of fully coupling all forces within the frame to those real objects that are outside the frame. While they are locally true, they are not isotropically so. The core constructs of M1, M2, and if it were real M3 (but M3 has been shown not to exist). M1 and M2 are instantiated by M6. Not until these various factors are recognized were the need to develop new reference frames also recognized and pursued. The cogent descirption of M5 (and M6) define there two types of reference frames, both of which are scale invariant and reconcile historical challenges.

Local Frame

Local frames contain real objects acting as the geometric basis for the reference frame, all of which is completely immersed and otherwise surrounded by space as defined by The Emergence Model. All vectors of these objects must, by definition, be imaginary numbers exactly because there is no way to measure them.

Event Frame

Event frames contain interacting real objects any one of which may act as the geometric basis of the frame. Event Frames may be nested, and may contain nested local frames.

Entanglement Gradient

Einstein - Hubble meeting
Einstein looking through Hubble’s instrument

The entanglement gradient spans the spectrum of real constructs (e.g. objects) for any given reference frame. Under The Emergence Model such constructs range from Most Basic Particles (MBPs) whose intrinsic nature configures them into all complex composite configurations of architectural mass by the Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance to produce everything real. Several key insights emerge as we unpack those points. First is that everything real is limited by Severance. Severance is why things break, decay, crumble, etc. Under The Emergence Model the term ‘c’ mode shifts definition to mean Severance which produces the photon emission velocity we measure with all interferometer experiments. Such experiments are essentially local. Because of this definitional shift when mode shifting it is important to realize that cosmological velocities are then governed by Rapidity (e.g. Concept Sieve EMCS01: Concept 0168) and consistent with The Emergence Model is properly read as velocity over Severance. This set of circumstances vindicates Hubble and explains all interferometer experiments, and essentially the reason Langer Epistemology Errors ensnared us all, including Einstein, within LEEs Empiricism Trap.


Speed of Entanglement

Mode shifting then previously conducted Bell Inequality Tests we find that the speed of entanglement is in fact superluminal.


Executive Summary

Unification demands and requires a credible path for the cogent description of M5, for example, to not only manifest everything real but to do so in a scale invariant manner. This feat is accomplished essentially, within The Emergence Model, through the intrinsic nature of MBPs from which we derive the to primary processes of configuration; the Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by the other, Severance. Key insight here recognizes that intrinsic nature results in processes that, due to that nature, intrinsically follow Knot Theory forming complex composite, discontinuous, architectures of mass. The entanglement gradient then describes the path, in both emergence and convergence vectors, all configurations follow from the smallest to the largest real objects which may integrate lower ordered constituents within their constructs. It is that complex composite, discontinuous, nature which provides the necessary scale linkage that spans various domains of discourse and their constituent detail sets no matter how restful the relationship and patterns may be.





Shop Now

#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #Reference #Frame #Entanglement

By Charles McGowen

Charles C McGowen is a strategic business consultant. He studied Aerospace Engineering at Auburn University '76-'78. IBM hired him early in '79 where he worked until 2003. He is now Chairman & CEO of SolREI, Inc. ORCID: