Harbinger of Supernova Event?

Betelgeuse is 642 lightyears distant from the Earth. That means if you go outside and find this star in the night sky the light you see at that moment is that old. Astronomers the world over are watching Betelgeuse for every sign of any change. Gravity waves have been detected which may be early signals that something has already happened, and we simply haven’t seen it yet in the light we receive. That would mean that gravity travels faster than light or that something happened which altered the system’s gravity signature but did not change the light output much. No one knows yet, but that later circumstance seems unlikely.

What happens in a supernova? The star collapses as a function of its mass and the internal layers of nuclear burning all travel toward the center of the star, and on reaching critical compression, rebound in nuclear fusion resulting in an immense release of energy. We call that explosion a supernova. Large volumes of newly created materials are thrown out into the interstellar medium.

Supernovas were a constant theme of research during our original systems review and processed through Elegant Reasonism. Supernova’s are fantastic examples of Events whose primary actors span all scales, and so as The Emergence Model was developed it was critical for complex composite architectures of mass be tied all the way back to the intrinsic nature of Most Basic Particles or MBPs. That means that in either direction of instantiation (e.g. quantum to cosmological or cosmological to quantum) it had to be isotropic in terms of how the processes worked.

So looking at the layering of elements within an example star, what we find are the onion like layering of elements in play during such an Event, and available not just for nucleosynthesis for elements higher on the Periodic Table, but for Cosmochemistry and Astromineralogy. Cosmochemistry is simply chemistry taking place in space rather than here on the Earth. Similarly, astromineralology is mineralogy taking place in space as well.

What is not at all obvious are all the various implications that are illuminated when we mode shift such Events through Elegant Reasonism between say M1 and M5. Go outside and find a pebble made out of quartz. Pick it up and hold it in your hand firmly. Quartz is a silicon oxide molecule. That means it is SiO2 or SiO3 or some molecular combination including those molecules. Now, look at the layering in the star to the right. During the supernova event, the oxygen layers had to rebound off the silicon layers. Not only would there be nucleosynthesis taking place, but there would be ample opportunity for the formation of molecules like quartz, and then that material would be ejected into the medium or consumed by the process and resulting objects in that Event Frame. But here’s the real point. Look at that pebble in your hand because you are likely holding the remnants of a supernova that took place a long time ago and in some far, far away place. How cool is that!

Now as you look at that pebble other ideas start to come to mind. The gas nebula theory of how our solar system formed in the first place is likely wrong. Why is it wrong? Simple. The regression analysis of the elements inside that pebble have more affinity with that supernova event than they do with possible formation in our solar system. We need only look at the image here to see that. It is a rather self-evident observation. But then we need to realize a whole bunch of other issues. Age of the Universe, travel time across interstellar distances, states of matter at low kelvin temperatures and how they interact, and so many more we can not list them all in this post. We then need to turn our attention not to space but back at the Earth. What are the implications to how the Earth was formed?

Supernova Ejecta Speeds Can Be 10% of Light

Supermassive black holes can have high energy vortexes at their poles, and they can eject huge blobs of matter at high rapidities. Such objects are called Blazars. But let’s back up to Betelgeuse. That star is only 642 lightyears distant. Even at 10% the speed of light, it would take a long time for that material to travel the intervening interstellar medium. But it is not out of the realm of possibilities. Look again at that pebble in your hand. It represents the only evidence you need to know that traversing that distance is possible because you are holding the evidence in your hand. It not only can happen,  it did happen. Look at that pebble with new eyes and think. Status quo thinkers are saying to themselves that the amount of time needed to cross those interstellar distances at those velocities are longer than the Universe is old, and from an M1 point of view they would be correct. Mode shifting that discussion however into M5 reveals a Universe a great deal older than anyone ever fathomed, and in that understanding comes insights into how that trip is not just possible but likely.

Does This Change Planetary Sciences?

This changes planetary sciences considerably. First, it dismantles the gaseous nebula formation theory and establishes The Emergence Model as the guiding model. Once The Emergence Model is comprehended in its basic definition, we then pay particular attention to the two processes derived from the intrinsic nature of MBPs. The build process limited by the other  process is the failure mode. The Fundamental Entanglement Function (e.g. the build process), is limited by Severance (e.g. the failure mode) which is responsible for configurations of MBPs forming everything real. Key in this discussion is not the build process but the failure mode of it (e.g. Severance). Severance is responsible for something completely unanticipated. Severance is principally responsible for the frangibility of mass.

Why this is important to planetary sciences does not become clear until we integrate these precepts holistically with other data points we know from science. One such point is the concept of Great Circle Arcs across our world. There are only three phenomena which can produce great circle arcs across our planet. Ships at sea charting a course, aircraft in flight, and inbound material from orbit. That’s it. There are zero naturally occurring phenomena in nature that produce clean great circle arcs.

Implications of Betelgeuse Objects

Ejecta material thrust into the interstellar medium at very high velocities produce projectiles at high rapidities which upon entering an Event Frame of a potential target create conditions suitable for the frangibility of mass. The SolREI original systems review took these scenarios through Elegant Reasonism, and the results were stunning. So now that we have a general understanding of the mechanisms that may produce high energy projectiles, and that those objects may suffer something called the frangibility of mass as a function of Severance, we need to see if there is evidence of such Events having transpired on the surface of the Earth. Status quo traditionalists will tell you any and all such evidence has been wiped out by continental drift, a theory long held as the ‘current accepted view’. Well, we’re about to sink that view, and despite all of the evidence collected supporting it. How are we going to do that? Simple. We are going to mode shift that evidence right out from under the feet of those scientists.

When we look at the Atlantic, for example, the Caribbean Basin might catch our attention. Setting aside preconceived notions about mechanics until we can establish a mode shifted understanding of what it is we are looking at, we can establish what Elegant Reasonism is now calling “Perimeters”. Perimeters are the remnants of inbound material Events on the Earth. It is not quite correct to call them ‘impacts’.

Ultimately, we established the complete foundation for understanding Perimeters on the Earth. This is where it all started. Ultimately it included objects like Betelgeuse and well beyond. The Emergence Model establishes the basic principles that enable us to understand Perimeters. Neither Newtonian nor standard Relativistic physics can accomplish these relationships, and they can not exactly because neither of those domains of discourse will ever unify physics. Newtonian will not because it is incapable of relativistic thinking. Relativistic thinking in context of M1, M2, or M3 can not unify physics exactly because they all employ basic constructs manifesting the spacetime-mass interface, across which no real object may traverse without first conversion to energy according to the Energy-Mass Equivalence relation.

We can continue these investigations to include every geographic region on Earth without exception. Many examples almost missed the Earth. They have high angles of incidence. All demonstrate the frangibility of mass. Most are primarily merger events. Not all Perimeters are primary in nature. Some are secondary or tertiary.

Perimeters can be positive, neutral, or negative. Energy signatures associated with Events span the spectrum from whispers to bangs, and yes that latter means what you likely think it does. Every bit of this is consistent with the cogent description of The Emergence Model’s logical view M5.

That cogent description creates the mechanisms configuring everything real from the smallest possible real object to the most massive known to science. The primary observation here is that these Perimeters exist. That they exist means that the continents have not moved to obliterate them in geologic time. That kills continental drift theory. Which means that we need to conduct a comprehensive systems review on the data we have previously interpreted to support that theory.  If these few examples don’t convince you, we have thousands upon thousands more. We have GPS data supporting tectonic movement being chiefly among those data points. What we expect is that the tectonic plates have the motion they do today because of planetary cooling and grinding between the plates that results. Another point supporting this view is the earthquake detail set. The overwhelming percentage of all earthquakes worldwide are between the tectonic plates. Almost zero are anywhere close to the epicenter of any tectonic plate. If they were moving across the surface of any substrate that would not be the case, but it is the case and that data supports this view. We can continue these examples and we have tens of thousands in our database. There are not fewer than 300 impact sites around the world. There are billions upon trillions. One need only understand what they see as they look. This data has been right under our noses the whole time, but we did not have the context in which to understand it. Context provided by Elegant Reasonism and The Emergence Model, which achieves unification.

When we consider the very high velocities of these materials in the context of the frangibility of mass Perimeter analysis becomes a science and discipline in and of itself. and it does not matter which body in the solar system we look at. It doesn’t have to be Earth. The image to the left is a picture of a Perimeter Chain (tracing a great circle arc) on Ganymede. Ganymede is the largest satellite in the solar system and a moon of Jupiter. Perimeters can be positive, neutral, or negative. There are energy signatures associated with them. They can be reverse engineered to determine all sorts of things about them. We talked about great circle arcs across the surface of the Earth. We have talked about the frangibility of mass. What we haven’t yet mentioned are Perimeter classes, energy signatures, and other factors used in the analysis of Perimeters. Pause for a few minutes and contemplate Shoemaker-Levy Nine impact at Jupiter a number of years ago. Inbound material, possessing high velocity, gravitationally locked but on an inbound vector for Earth. Now the size and constitution of materials in each of these objects is such that they not only penetrate our atmosphere but they penetrate into Earth’s crust leaving our planet essentially wounded. The plasticized interior fills those wounds with magma opening the potential for them to become volcanoes. Now, look at the Hawaiian Island Chain. That island chain follows a great circle arc across the surface of the Earth. The tectonic movement theory over the hot pocket is bogus. The reason it is bogus is this. The Hawaiian Islands are not the only island chain on that tectonic plate. The Kiribati Islands are also on that tectonic plate and guess what. They also trace out a great circle arc but there is a very salient difference. The vector is different. It is not possible for the same plate to move in a way creating both chains using that traditional theory. That’s why that theory is bogus. What does bring all of that back together into a cogent explanation is Elegant Reasonism and The Emergence Model. And it does it in a manner consistent with the actual real unified Universe.

Have you ever wondered why craters are wider than they are deep? The answer to that question is the frangibility of mass and that concept requires Severance in order to understand and apply in any investigation. The concepts don’t just dove tail, they reinforce one another holistically. That’s yet another reason why we know The Emergence Model is a better model.

All of the geologist around the world are looking at these images right now and wondering what this implies about Continental Drift Theory. That theory is dead. Plain and simple and despite the data to the contrary. The material of the Earth is essentially where it landed. The land masses appear older than the ocean basins because on impact those materials manifested the granite basement rocks which thermally insulated them allowing them to cool while the basins remained above their respective critical temperatures. This gives the illusion that the ocean basins are younger than the land masses. They are not. They simply cooled later giving them that appearance. Perimeter data worldwide reinforce this view as does that pebble in your hand.

The Emergence Model does not begin and end with the physical sciences.  It can describe the increasing orders of complexities up through Preons, (configurations of MBPs not generally perceivable) through all of the particles known to the Standard Model (but which we mode shift into The Emergence Model of Particle Physics), and all the way up to the largest supermassive black hole. That capability naturally includes an ability to explain the split between inorganic and organic molecules consistent with what it is we think we know re: mode shifted Knowledge Management. Once we recognize those capabilities, we then realize how those capabilities instantiate Elegant Reasonism as an epistemology and everything that implies. All of these capabilities come fully into play as a facet of being able to describe the fully unified Universe Bang to Bang.

More Insights to Come

The insights flowing from wielding Elegant Reasonism are considerable across every discipline of science and philosophy. Seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe is epic by any measure. Unification is only the first step. Wielding with with impunity is boring. Engaging civilization and watching the resulting illumination is what we live for. We very much enjoy seeing people light up in the wake of awareness. Are you situationally aware?

Summary

There is a point that may not be obvious. Tweakers to this or that facet of status quo thinking who believe that the answer to unification is just around the corner we just need to throw more money at M1 experiments are dead wrong. M1 is a logic trap. It’s like looking for a penny in the corner of a round room. You are never going to find it because there are no corners. Elegant Reasonism does not just make sense of this point or that point, it unifies every single one of them holistically and it in that moment of realization that the power of it begins to ring clear. And when you can then look at some sample, in this context, you see that sample with new eyes and perceive clues you didn’t even know to look for before.

The image to the left is Kepler’s Supernova SN1604, so named because Johannes Kepler witnessed the Event in 1604. This image is a composite image of the ejecta produced by that explosion. It is exemplary of everything we have worked on yielding Elegant Reasonism and The Emergence Model. It took from 2004 until May 7th, 2019 to conduct that systems review and associated R&D. This was neither quick nor lightly treated. It was a journey of note for another time. It is for these reasons this image is in the background of our introduction video on SolREI Studios.

Deniers in every possible discipline will object and cry foul until they comprehend that they are likely espousing issues tied out to the context of fundamental interpretations that can never achieve unification. And in that moment they will realize what commission of Langer Epistemology Errors has done to them. Areas where The Emergence Model appears deficient in some way are more likely known unknowns that simply have not been investigated as yet. We have tested all of this to our satisfaction, and again we hold the patent, and we are going to educate everyone willing to learn.

__________________________________

Shop

#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #UnifiedUniverse #Supernova #Perimeters