Bringing It All Together

SolREI Studios just built a new playlist on ‘Motivation and Attitude‘ and something emerged from that effort. Look at where and how Wozniak built that first board for what became Apple Computers. Look at the world headquarters for Linux operating systems now powering every web server, all android cell phones, and many other devices you’d never suspect. Our own company has grow up. We now have almost five people. Counting part time help almost ten. Around 1910 NCR was the largest tabulating company on Earth. They fired one of their leading salesmen over something trivial. Do you know where the term ‘fired’ came from? It came from NCR’s John Henry Patterson’s, predilection associated with releasing someone from his company of taking all contents of their office, while they were out at lunch, down to the front area of the building and setting them ablaze. His rationale was that if they were not worthy to keep employed then nothing in their office was worth keeping either. Who was the salesman fired that fateful day? His name was Thomas J Watson, Sr and he left NCR and built what ultimately became IBM. The common thread through these observations should send shockwaves through the bastion halls of institutionalized thinking everywhere. Entrepreneurial thinking, proverbial wild ducks, should be nurtured, not censured. Some of the most astounding insights known to civilization came in essential solitude, not social bastions. At the time Einstein released his first paper he was still a patent clerk. Only later did he join a university. Orville and Wilbur Wright worked in the back of their bicycle shop.

Thinking Circa 1900

Niels Bohr Quote — Matter is Described Through Interactions & Relationships

The very label “Physics” implies that those professionals are working with the ‘real physical realm of existence’, but are they? Actually that’s the wrong question. The correct question is “Can they?”, and by that I mean in a direct human physiological manner can they? While the issue had long been known only a hand full bothered to describe the challenge. Most took it in stride. Reams of papers, speeches, patents, were produced about the realm in which we exist. Some scientists probed the heavens with large telescopes pointing out into the vastness. Others the very small. Some engaged the interactions between materials and quierried the transformation processes that resulted. Not until 1948 were the implications realized and not by a scientists, but by a philosopher. Which is probably why all of the scientists ignored her. The one thing that absolutely every scientist on the planet forgot was that science is itself a philosophy. Just a particular type of philosophy with great rigor, discipline, and standardization. In short it was believed that institutionalizing such pursuits would produce the greatest results. Great bastions of academic institutions were created and it was thought that through diversity of curricula would germinate and inspire the necessary spirit. As the decades unfolded it became clear that entrepreneurial thinking is exceedingly difficult to ‘teach’.

Prior to May 7th, 2019 most professional scientists have no clue what a Langer Epistemology Error is much less what its implications are. Only those registering and going through our training really grasp the ramifications. Even fewer still perceive the inevitable turmoil on the horizon, despite any attempt to signal the impending storm. That is the nature of the Innovator’s Dilemma, as noted by Clayton Christensen. Clayton’s book describes ‘disintermediating technologies relative to competition, adaptation, flexibility, and survivability in business.

Inflection

May 7th, 2019 is an inflection point in civilization and it is so exactly because that is now the recognized date by the United States Patent and Trademark Office granting Patent Pending 16405134 Elegant Reasonism. The world is changing underneath your very feet and in all likelihood you are utterly oblivious to what is coming. Make no mistake about it. The inflection point has been driven and nothing on Earth can stop it. It is going to happen irrespective of any other action taken by anyone or anything. On that date our company, SolREI, Inc filed for and received from the USPTO patent pending status on unification. While the scientist types are all saying ‘oh yeah right’ and attributing the word ‘physics’ to that phrase they are missing the larger tapestry Elegant Reasonism makes manifest. Elegant Reasonism produced the model which brings together that particular discipline of science to be sure but it accomplishes a great deal more than that. It gives us a framework to quest truth as a function of the actual real unified Universe and do so philosophically, and too consistent with scientific principle. The implications of being able to describe the Universe Bang to Bang necessarily requires us to ask greater questions about what we have in common not just with each other, but the Universe itself. Carl Sagan said in his seminal production entitled Cosmos that “We are a way for the Universe to know itself.” Carl had no idea how true that was. When Einstein said “We can not solve problems using the same thinking we used when we created them”, neither did he fathom the truth of those words.

We conducted a systems review employing what is now Elegant Reasonism and produced The Emergence Model, the first model to close to unification. That model powerful though it may be, pales in comparison to the power delivered by the processes & methods used to make it manifest. Not until you fully comprehend the implications of Elegant Reasonism as a full fledged epistemology which accomplished that feat will those feeble rays of illumination begin to illustrate the full impact it brings to human physiology. Tony Robbins may speak of Neural Linguistic Programming (NLP) but Elegant Reasonism brings to bear Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (NNRP) and it can do that exactly because it intrinsically is capable of describing the entire Universe Bang to Bang and that necessarily includes us (and all that implies).

What We Think We Know is Contextual

Elegant Reasonism calls knowledge domains of any given profession or discipline “detail sets”. Those detail sets characterize any given area of expertise any human may seek or acquire. What Elegant Reasonism brings to bear on not just the issue of unification but all investigations seeking truth as a function of the unified Universe is juxtaposition of interpretive models as a set subsequently juxtaposed against a set paradigms of interest and all subjected to analytical inquiry in a manner that recognizes, illuminates, and analyzes a given domain of discourse minimizing what we now call Langer Epistemology Errors. The issue is that what it is you think you know is a function of context and that context is established by the fundamental encapsulated interpretive model manifesting the lens through which you perceive existence. What Elegant Reasonism provides is the means to juxtaposed multiple such interpretations in pursuit of an investigation.

The Predicate Priority

Considering such models the predicate priority must be unification. If your model does not fully comply with the realm of the c’s and close to unification before all other considerations then you are potentially setting yourself up for failure. Back in 1905 not a soul on Earth comprehended these issues. Absolutely everyone believed they were describing attributes of the physical world rather than abstractions of it. Believing you are working directly with reality is committing a Langer Epistemology Error (potentially) of epic proportions. That was the error we all made. That is the situation that Elegant Reasonism corrects.

The Larger Tapestry

The actual real Universe is unified whether or not any individual human believes it or not. The Universe does not care what you believe. It did not care if people in 1300 believed their world was flat or if they noticed the masts of ships slowly sinking on the horizon. The larger tapestry lay beyond the particle horizon and the clues to what lay there are in the WMAP data. In fact there are clues all around us literally everywhere. Walk outside and pick up a piece of quartz. Contemplate the implications of the layers of nuclear burning inside a collapsing supernova where silicon and oxygen are rebounding in intense circumstances and the vast volumes of material tossed out into the interstellar medium. Now, go look up the chemical formula for quartz. Contemplate how that material got from there to your hand.

Truth

Elegant Reasonism, as an epistemology, seeks truth from the unified Universe. That means logical claims must connect to and close with unified views of the Universe. What happens when we align truth in that manner is that we gain a holistic precipice. A precipice that once gained can not be easily dismissed. It can be denied but that denial will ultimately prove to be in vain. Many concepts mode shift in the tumultuous environs of Elegant Reasonism. Elegant Reasonism can be a very unpleasant process if you are committed to status quo positions. If you are open minded and embrace new insights and sudden revelation then you are very likely to be exuberant. And once your thinking realigns you suddenly perceive the realm in which we exist as a function of the unified Universe, but you do so – in real time. And that, changes everything you do, think, and say.

Human central nervous systems instantiate paradigms of consciousness and perceptions. Think about that for a very long time. Read that sentence over and over again. Now, imagine the implications of your thoughts and perceptions driving neural paths aligned with the unified Universe. Think of what you will see and perceive as you engage absolutely everything within the realm in which humanity exists. It’s a pretty staggering thing to contemplate.

__________________________________