A Rabbit Hole in The Hedge

The Center for European Nuclear Research (CERN) hopes that its Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will provide clues to the unification of forces (e.g. unification of physics). The issue is the manner in which they seek what they seek. The thinking at this venerable organization is mired deep within the logic trap that is M1, and those beliefs are reinforced by the successful tie outs to the context made manifest by that model. The spacetime-mass interface will effectively preclude any success for them so long as they employ thinking driven by M1, M2, or M3. As long as that thinking remains constrained within this logic trap, no one at CERN will ever achieve unification. They can not, and they can not, exactly because the fundamental constructs of M1 preclude it. They can spend billions and trillions of Euros, and they will never reach their goal.

The issue is the thinking associated with M1. M1 was developed at at time when unification was not the goal or objective. Explaining the constancy of the speed of light was that original objective not unification. Unification must be a predicate priority consideration in any model before any monies are spent on R&D. Consequently, we have no need to write down long mathematical equations or have any discussions about this particle or that particle. Those discussions obfuscate the issue with irrelevant detail, and, again, the issue is ‘predicate priority consideration of unification’ in every aspect of the encapsulated interpretive model being employed. The one they are using simply does not get the job done, nor will it ever. They may as well be chasing the proverbial Alice’s rabbit down its hole.

Open Suggestion to CERN

Our open suggestion to CERN is to embrace Elegant Reasonism. The quest to unify physics is over. SolREI, Inc already unified physics when the company developed The Emergence Model using its now patent pending 16405134 Elegant Reasonism, and using this patented process describe the Universe “Bang to Bang“. The likely answers to the plethora of questions now flooding readers of this post are answered by our web site when you register as a Learner and confirm your email address.

Elegant Reasonism unifies more than a discipline of science. It unifies philosophy and seeks truth as a function of the actual real unified Universe, and therein lay the distinctive value delivered by no other epistemology. It’s methodology, process, technology, and epistemology executed across its phases of recognition, illumination, and analysis will develop a treatise compliant with what we call the realm of c’s resulting in a Treatise fully compliant with the unified Universe.

What is at Stake?

What is at stake is CERNs total annual budget, every experiment, and 100% of its HR effectiveness. What is interesting about Elegant Reasonism is that Systems Reviews can be conducted under its auspices, and 100% of what it is we think we already know can be mode shifted toward the actual real unified Universe. There is a great deal of work yet to do, and CERN will be vital to that future work, but its efforts need to be refocused in context of the unified Universe not mired within a logic trap.

Missed Opportunity

When CERN equipment is fabricated, installed, and operated it is done so from the point of view of M1. A comprehensive systems review would be needed in order to mode shift the necessary paradigms of interest to something with affinity for M5. Ideally, the instrumentality would be constructed in a manner that would allow for dynamic mode shifting, but I fear we are years away from being able to do that quite yet. Part of the point here is that the equipment is intrinsically designed entrenched in M1 rather than M5. That distinction means it is only going to report M1 derived logically correct results, and it will continue to fail to find the answer regarding unification exactly because of this fact. Not until the entire organization has embraced Elegant Reasonism and comprehends the implications of unification will this situation change.

What Steps Can CERN Take?

CERN should:

Have all relevant personnel register as Learners with SolREI.co and confirm their relative and respective email addresses. It costs nothing and will immediately grant them access to basic materials.
CERN should engage the company about licensing our IP asset.

Why CERN should take these actions is it will protect them going forward and because our patent covers derivative works. The intent is to concentrate feedback through us so that insights may be rapidly integrated into the program we are building to get the latest insights out. If what we accomplished had been easy to do, it would have been done many decades ago. While it is simple to the point of elegance, it is neither easy to grasp nor apply in circumstances requiring keen situational awareness and critical thinking. The reason for this apparent distinction has more to do with the individual. Everyone must wrestle their own daemons, and no one can do that for them except themselves.

Learning about Elegant Reasonism is free. All anyone need do is register and confirm the email address provided. Our system will immediately place the mechanics of Elegant Reasonism before them. As the system matures and we are able to integrate more from our body of work, registered users may chose to subscribe to our ongoing insights and maybe apply them in revenue generating activities. Regardless of the motivation, the path forward is clearly illuminated by Elegant Reasonism.

__________________________________