Oh, Schrodinger’s Cat is Dead Too

We can dispatch both of these concepts with some deftly wielded observations; however, it is probably more accurate to say that these concepts are only logically correct rather than dead. What needs to be understood is the intrinsic nature of these constructs.

  • Nothing real can transition the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy and that is governed by an equation needing no introduction here. This simple but hard cold fact is the genesis of the inability for all Encapsulated Interpretative Models (EIMs) based on these core constructs from closing to unification. Such based models are for those and other reasons logical rather than physical. That’s right, something can be logically correct yet remain physically different.
    • This is the reason no reference frame made manifest by EIMs employing these constructs can employ a common geometric basis point for all real objects in the same frame
    • This is the reason no reference frame containing real objects can fully couple all forces to all real objects across all scales
  • Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) are epistemologically fatal errors that occur when we mistake abstractions for actual reality.
  • The first bullet point relegates the entire EIM, and everything based on it, to the realm of the logical and not physical because of the systemic nature of EIMs. Therefore Schrodinger’s wave function is also logical for the same reasons. Not to put too fine a point on this but these conclusions were backed up by The Death of Schrodinger’s Cat  where cognitive science also relegates the wave function to logical realm.
  • The arrow of time is always positive exactly because, under M5, time is an action displacement index and action is always positive. See associated concepts within EMCS01.

Stare at the image for this article and put your finger on the common geometric basis point for 100% of all those universe bubbles depicted. You can not do that. That concept is pretty but it is exclusively logical in its nature. It is just as logical as the wave function on which those ideas are based. The concept of the multiverse is as dead as a door nail. Any idea or concept based on the multiverse is a red herring. Shareholders, taxpayers, agencies, individuals, governments, or groups financially investing in such ventures are wasting your hard earned money. You are chasing an object in the corner of a round room. It does not exist in the real world. Such folks should pay very close attention to the presentation: In Unification’s Wake, Part 05: Business Impact and our article here pointing out that Elegant Reasonism is a highly Disruptive Technology.

While our User Library is online for those who register and is reasonably extensive, out of the set of our acknowledgments three individuals float to the top of our list of contributors who influenced the development of Elegant Reasonism:

  • Einstein, Albert – He was absolutely 100% logically correct with his models and therein lay the strategic clue necessary in order to gain the precipice of unification.
  • Langer, Susanne K – We named the type of epistemological error leading to unification after her in her honor. She was one of if not the first female American philosopher recognized both in popularity and professionally for the body of her work. She first noted in 1948 that mistaking abstractions for actual reality was a near fatal epistemological error.
  • Okun, Lev B – Provided clarity segregating Einstein‘s original thinking (e.g. M2) where mass was considered invariant from modern interpretations (e.g. M1) which hold it variant.

Modern information sciences points out that something can be logically correct yet remain physically different. Systems Engineering principles illuminate the processes used to capture requirements across these various domains of discourse and their respective constituent detail sets. Immersed in what ultimately has become Elegant Reasonism these capabilities powerfully come into their own. The more you comprehend the more powerful the tools are. Please wield them carefully and transformationally.

Engage the User Library here. Review the presentations. Read the articles. Comprehend the utility process, its framework supporting the epistemology. If you actively and openly do that we are confident that you will find these conclusions just as compelling as we did. We have placed all this material online for exactly that purpose. We worked for well over a decade trying to break this and find fault with it. Every single time we made such an effort it all only got stronger and dovetailed all the evidence tighter. In Feynman’s words it was another more perfect thing. We miss that guy.

Cheers everyone! We are looking forward to your mode shifted insights!  Sic’em!


Stay up to date with the latest developments and insights by subscribing to our newsletter.


#ElegantReasonism #EmergenceModel #Unification #Multiverse #SchrodingersCat #Logic


By Charles McGowen

Charles C McGowen is a strategic business consultant. He studied Aerospace Engineering at Auburn University '76-'78. IBM hired him early in '79 where he worked until 2003. He is now Chairman & CEO of SolREI, Inc. ORCID: