Black Holes

The Emergence Model‘s cogent description of M5 presents us with the basic mechanisms for configuring MBPs in to everything real as made manifest through architectural mass. The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance produces the configurations which result in all phenomena, properties, and real objects along the entire entanglement gradient and is consistent in both the emergent and convergent vectors. Following up the entanglement gradient we find increasing action per unit area instantiated by lower ordered constructs (e.g. Gravitons) to begin causing collapse into hydrostatic equilibrium (e.g. a sphere). The first stages of such a collapse break down molecular chemical bonds. Ices and Rocks succumb early along the collapse gradient. As a body grows in mass molecules begin to break down into chemical elements and segregate by atomic mass. Stages following find action per unit area high enough that at elemental boundaries nuclear fusion takes place and stars ignite. Continued mass building continues past stellar ignition to burn higher ordered configurations on the periodic table but only to a point. Around iron greater energies are needed. Mass continues to be gained until such time as internal temperatures can no longer support external layers and the star violently collapses resulting in a supernova. Supernova events are responsible for many, if not most, if not all of the remaining elements on the periodic table. The Emergence Model suggests a new stellar class: the Collision Class Events, which may produce some of the elements. Mass gain continues along the entanglement gradient pulling materials to the center of hydrostatic equilibrium past elemental constructs into the realm of subatomic resulting in neutron stars. The next stage beyond neutron stars are black holes.

The emergence vector along the entanglement gradient is explored often in science. The key insight however is not the emergence vector but the convergence vector which arises as a function of the 2nd derivative process in The Emergence Model which is the limiting factor of Severance. Interesting as Hawking Radiation is our original systems review recognized the implications of The Fundamental Entanglement Function, limited by Severance results in the frangibility of architectural mass – including black holes. That insight results in a much faster manner of dismantling a black hole. Event Frames containing two or more black holes whose relative and respective energies exceed all Severance values for every object in the frame will cause those objects to suffer frangibility (e.g. their configurations will suffer Severance and be reduced back to MBPs). That insight resulted in/led to the Bang to Bang insight. When we look around the unified Universe what we find are supermassive black holes racing off at increasing z-factors (e.g. multiples of the speed of light basically setting the process up to repeat elsewhere).

Mode Shifted Insights

Black Holes have a minimum size because their formation requires an action per unit area not sustainable below that threshold. The original systems review notes explore that discussion pp 175 – 185. That threshold seems to be about ~30 km. There is an ongoing search for smaller examples. That was the smallest we found at the time of our review.
Black Holes are, in M1, called mathematical singularities because the mathematics fail below the Event Horizon (e.g. are incongruous relative to the holistic body of mathematics/astrophysics). Under M5 while vast questions remain, what is clear is the intrinsic nature of MBPs resiliently persists. Having said that what we still don’t know can likely fill all the libraries on Earth. Considerable R&D needs to be done on the architectures of mass.
Proposition 0017, leads to Proposition 0010, and is congruent with Proposition 0149. In that context, and observing that under the EIM M5 EMCS01 Concept 0091 Entanglement Function Density Per Unit Area at the event horizon for a Black Hole is high enough not even light can escape deserves a great deal more attention. Historically photons were considered consumed by gravity under M1, M2 and potentially M3 (presuming M3 actually exists – current conclusions do not support that possibility). Mode shifting those discussions under The Emergence Model potentially eviscerates photon architectural mass and simply pushes remnants below the event horizon. The ensuing soup of MBPs within the event horizon would follow their intrinsic nature; however, concept 0091 suggests that function density might be high enough such that no constructs of higher order than that of Gravitons might survive. Consequently Black Holes are essentially Graviton stars. This line of reasoning is holistically consistent with The Emergence Model and the unified Universe which is always held litmus.

This page is under heavy development integrating information from the original systems review into this website across all concept sieves. Please subscribe to the newsletter.