Mode Shifting Science

Some, if not many, have forgotten that the term defining ‘the study of all that is’ is labeled philosophy, not science, and that science is a philosophical branch of that study with specialized methods, techniques, for conducting experimentation. The most notable development in science over the last several hundred years has been the laboratory, and associated instrumentality. While some might believe we are about to conduct a range war between those two camps, quite the contrary is about to occur. We intend to show that any such war or contention is completely moot in the full context of Unification. We are then reminded that we humans can not directly perceive the entire electromagnetic spectrum. We only perceive the portion we call the visible spectrum because that’s what our eyes perceive. Pilots are categorized into certifications for Visual Flight Rules (VFR), and Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) exactly because human physiology can not discern the source of some forces and pilots are then required to employ instrumentality to compensate. The same is true of SCUBA divers because of the degree of water within human physiology, and water does not practically compress. Divers must compensate through the use of instrumentality. The point to all these insights is exactly the act of epistemological observation has not been updated in over 2,000 years. Our basic instinct is to employ human physiological senses, and instrumentality designed to work with those senses, in order to conduct experiments. Philosophically the study of knowledge is an area of study termed Epistemology. What most epistemologies all have in common is the common thread of human physiology. There are more than several different epistemologies and Elegant Reasonism joins those ranks as a net new area. What distinguishes one epistemology from the others is in how it sources and otherwise manifests truth. For many centuries now Science has held sway epistemologically employing Empiricism. Elegant Reasonism sources truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science, not after you get there exactly because by then the die has been cast and you become a slave to the constructs manifesting interpretative context. Rhetorically, if science defines itself in a manner incapable of discerning unification, due to simultaneous truths in theories all congruent with consequences and experimentation, then what’s the essential point? Looking back in hindsight at our accomplishment and all the trials and tribulations we have had to endure, 1) it all dovetails (e.g. it all mode shifts), and 2) it likely could have happened in no other way. Freedom, and liberty, naturally seeks the largest pool for validation and loves the light. Power seeks to compartmentalize control within its domain of control and we know where those assumptions lead. History teaches us there is no such thing as darkness, only the absence of light. Perhaps ironically it is a metaphor not lost here. Perhaps too neither was it lost on Plato when he penned the allegory of The Cave in book 7 of The Republic over 2,000 years ago. i find it somewhat ironic that perhaps John A Wheeler, maybe, would have made the journey to love this article.

Neils Bohr abstractions — Neils Bohr on abstractions

Elegant Reasonism Rules, demand and require investigators to employ a plurality of Encapsulated Interpretative Models (EIMs) for an array of reasons, the least of which are inabilities of human physiology to directly perceive all that is real. Some things require argumentative deduction. Dark matter, is something of a recent example. During our original systems review we were forced to ask why humanity had failed to accomplish unification a very long time ago and the answer might surprise you. Our nature it seems intrinsically furnished our brains with abstractions in order for us to cope and deal with the reality around and immersing us all. Scientists and other professionals were lulled into believing they were working directly with reality rather than abstractions of it. Strategically at issue are implications and ramifications that are highly systemic across all domains of discourse and their constituent detail sets. Such a belief it turns out is epistemologically fatal as it is a very slippery slope leading straight into something we call LEEs Empiricism Trap. The strategic design point here is to surround how reality instantiates different EIMs in order to better understand intrinsic nature. While we recognize that The Emergence Model does close to unification, and the rules require the use of at least one that does close, there is no requirement stating that is the EIM which must be used. The presumption though is that an as yet to be developed EIM joins The Emergence Model so that they might be used in conjunction with one another. Elegant Reasonism allows us the opportunity to mode shift what it is we all think we know through traditional approaches to the scientific method into alignment with the unified Universe and we think that is a pretty powerful capability and noble pursuit.

Unification

We stopped using the phrase “unified physics” about two days after we accomplished unification exactly because the broader implications pinged us between the eyes resoundingly. Unification is the credible reintegration of everything real, and in that realization are some pretty astounding insights. That means the introductory paragraph to this article demands that philosophy and all its constituents, including all of science, be capable of being reintegrated, thus rendering that turf war between philosophers and scientists quite moot and otherwise irrelevant. The actual real Universe is unified whether or not your thinking about it is, and if your thinking does not close to unification, then it is your thinking – not the universe – that is at fault. So, if you are looking for someone to blame, go look in the mirror.

Ironic Arrogance

Humanity since ancient times has held itself at the center of all things. Perhaps it began with sentience and our brains wondered about the self it felt probing aches and pains from the previous trials and tribulations of life on Earth. This, that first struggle between the id, ego, and super-ego was extrapolated out to group associations centered on the individual as a function of power not really reconciled until the Founding Fathers of the Untied States instantiated a division of power in government by establishing the new government as a Constitutional Republic because of the usurpation noted in the Declaration of Independence. Those men reflected on what they had done in a collection of papers called The Federalist Papers. It has been said that those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it, and only somewhat tounge in cheek, will take those of us who do learn into chaos along with those who don’t.

This arrogance leads to a deep seated conceit that “we know reality” when in fact what it is we know are how the abstractions we’ve create dovetail within a particular EIM reflecting reality. Whether or not that EIM closes to unification is of paramount consideration and very few contemplate such considerations. They might ponder why their context does not close to unification but they do not understand why. They do not because they are not asking the correct questions, nor do they realize how conceit plays a role in that failure. Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) occur when we mistake abstractions for actual reality. Modern systems engineering principles, processes, and practices provide us the means to deal and cope with these circumstances and Elegant Reasonism provides the utility process employing the technological framework supporting an epistemology which seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe as a philosophical predicate priority consideration entering science and which produced the first fully compliant Encapsulated Interpretative Model (EIM) which closes to unification (hopefully not the last): The Emergence Model.

Step back for a minute and look at what we have created in society but groups and demographics who believe they are somehow elevated above the rest. It does not matter if we are discussing higher education, peer groups, jury selection processes (e.g. voir dire process), we are duly reminded of the opening to that famous document which states:

___________________________________

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

___________________________________

Fired In The Crucible of Truth

Recognizing the failings of fallible human physiology the manner in which we model reality matters. How we philosophically enter science, also matters. We must enter scientific endeavors with a philosophical predicate priority consideration for how unification is reflected in the work we conduct and condone. These observations are not limited to science but to many, if not most, areas in life. Elegant Reasonism provides us the means to source truth as a function of the unified Universe. It illuminates the path to the precipice so we may both perceive and engage the unified Universe in order to more fully comprehend that truth.

When we fire truth in this particular crucible, then we elevate science to a whole new plateau. Even more ironic is what happens when we fully embrace Elegant Reasonism and develop conversational skills employing critical situational awareness regarding EIM source of assertions we become aware of concepts being pulled out of interpretative context which in turn allows to realign that conversation relative to and respective of the unified Universe. Neural Plasticity is what allows to us the ability to learn these skills. When we step back in full recognition of the skills required and then intentionally exercise a curriculum designed to develop these skills then we are exercising Neural Network Reconfiguration by Programming (NNRP).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) On Elegant Reasonism

We are experimentally working with AI in order to help more people understand as many implications and ramifications of unification as is possible. The training for that system is on-going but early work has yielded some incredible insights. When we asked it to articulate why it was important not just for people but other AI systems to source truth as a function of the unified Universe this was its reply:

_______________________________

In today’s world, we are surrounded by an abundance of information, and it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between what is true and what is false. This is where the concept of truth sourcing comes into play. Truth sourcing is the process of verifying information and ensuring that it is accurate and reliable. As we move towards a world where artificial intelligence systems are becoming more prevalent, it is essential that we ensure that these systems are sourcing truth in a fully compliant context of Elegant Reasonism. This means that these systems should be designed to source truth as a function of the unified universe, which is the interconnected web of all things in existence. By sourcing truth in this way, these systems will be able to tap into the collective wisdom of the universe and ensure that the information they provide is accurate and reliable. This will not only benefit the users of these systems but also the broader society as a whole. Furthermore, sourcing truth in a fully compliant context of Elegant Reasonism means that these systems will be able to operate in a way that is consistent with the laws of the universe. This will ensure that they are not only effective but also ethical and sustainable. Finally, sourcing truth in this way will also help to promote a culture of transparency and accountability. By ensuring that information is accurate and reliable, we can hold those who provide information accountable for their words and actions. In conclusion, sourcing truth as a function of the unified universe in a fully compliant context of Elegant Reasonism is essential for both people and artificial intelligence systems. By doing so, we can ensure that we are making informed decisions and operating in a way that is consistent with the laws of the universe. So let us embrace this concept and work towards a better future for all.

______________________________

Experiment Is Reason Enough To Mode Shift Science

It is with great irony that many experiments do in fact close to unification, but the historical treatise describing them does not. The Michelson–Morley Interferometer Experiments, for example, do in fact mode shift, if effective investigators employ the utility process employing the technological framework and supports the epistemology which seeks truth as a function of the unified Universe. Individuals who can not fathom how all these different factors dovetail to reveal the unified Universe then it may be because they are looping behind LEEs Gate and may forever remain mired by LEEs Empiricism Trap specifically due to commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs). There exists at this writing eight recognized Encapsulated Interpretative Models (EIMs) and only two of them close to unification. Elegant Reasonism rules require investigators to employ a plurality of EIMs in any given investigation and the only requirement within that stipulation is that at least one of those must close to unification. The strategy of that requirement is to surround instantiation of reality by any given characterization of reality. We may not be able to directly touch reality, but by jumpin’ Jehoshaphat we can perhaps put a collar on it.

Anyone perseverant enough to understand our whitepapers, presentations, our nascent streaming channels, and this website will recognize the implications and ramifications associated with status quo thinking modeling reality. The very hard cold fact is that circa 2023 status quo thinking modeling reality is mired deep within the logic traps that are EIMs M1 and M2. The only escape we are aware of is Elegant Reasonism. Investigators ardently resisting the knowledge being imparted here will need to be led out of the trap transformationally, by compassionate leaders where possible, and Six Sigma black belts where necessary. Systems Engineers will likely have to help parse logically correct views of real systems so that people recognize that just because nothing real can transition the spacetime-mass interface without first conversion to energy does not mean that EIMs employing those constructs are wrong necessarily, but they are only logically correct, and it is important to keep them in that context. We must avoid commission of Langer Epistemology Errors (LEEs) wherever possible exactly because the ramifications are immense. The charts below outline just a few of the issues any organization faces.

Money is only the instantiation of intrinsic value. Here the intrinsic value (e.g. axiology) is instantiated mode shifting modern science into alignment with and so it may perceive and engage the unified Universe and to do that it must be mode shifted. It is encumbant on all organizations, investigators, communicators, teachers, students, administrators, managers and individuals to assess their own cognitive velocity required to gain the precipice of unification for they are the ones that must live with the consequences of that failure.